Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 16th November 2008 Change Date

Free Gerhard Richter Print

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Celtic 2-0 Falkirk: Shaun back from the dead



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 24 August 2008
Celtic 3

McManus 31; Samaras 43, 68

Falkirk 0
IN TYPICAL soul-baring mode, Shaun Maloney spent Friday lunchtime's media conference to mark the beginning of his second spell at Celtic confessing to the grave mistake he had made in ever leaving. Around 26 hours later, he, and his Parkhead employer
s, would have been left in no doubt about the wisdom of his truth and reconciliation.

Maloney's contribution to a victory that returned Celtic to the top of the Clydesdale Bank Scottish Premier League for the first time since they won it in May was so instant and obvious it was as if he was an electrical current firing up Celtic's power supply. His game-changing impact succeeded in overshadowing the serious-looking ankle problem sustained by Jan Vennegoor of Hesselink that brought him into the fray as a 28th minute substitute; a double for Georgios Samaras, playing because of a month-sidelining groin strain suffered by Scott McDonald and a competent debut from Glenn Loovens, in for the injured Gary Caldwell following a £2.5m move from Cardiff City.

The same figure will make its way to Aston Villa if Maloney reaches certain targets for appearances and achievements and, even with an element of rustiness to his game, he must have exceeded any possible target for how his first game back at Celtic Park would pan out. He had a hand in all three goals and seemed to galvanise Aiden McGeady, Scott Brown and Shunsuke Nakamura, who all began to feed off his energy and play with greater freedom.

Strachan wasn't willing to go overboard on the Maloney effect, but he did acknowledge it. "He came on and played very well and certainly lifted the crowd," the Celtic manager said. "I thought there were some special performances out there with Nakamura, ably backed by McGeady and Samaras."

Strachan didn't bite over possible concerns over losing his first-choice, 51-goal strike pairing ahead of the Old Firm game on Sunday. Vennegoor of Hesselink suffered a "bad gash" just above his ankle and will now be examined for possible bone or ligament damage. McDonald has a strain with his abductor muscle but Strachan maintains he could return next week. "They are good players but we were playing last week and only scored one and they didn't play and we scored three," he said. "In saying that, whenever you play Falkirk you are going to create chances and they will make chances."

Maloney had only been on the field for three minutes when he wriggled and jinked to earn a free-kick, or more accurately bought one, that Shunsuke Nakamura flighted in from the right flank, for Stephen McManus to bundle in, using his arm according to Falkirk manager John Hughes. Five minutes later came the sort of surging run from the middle of the park that hasn't been a feature of Celtic's, largely immobile, forward play. Picking up the ball just inside Falkirk's half, Maloney hammered forward with his little legs birling like Roadrunner before his wily brain allowed him to release Samaras with a perfectly weighted pass. The Greek did the rest by rounding keeper Robert Olejnik and sliding the ball in from an angle on the right.

Thereafter, it was as if every Celtic player wanted to get in on the act and produce the sort of free-flowing stuff that is the only way Maloney plays when imbued with confidence – helped by a two-goal lead, of course. Maloney could even afford the luxury of a couple of glaring misses when one-on-one with Olejnik before demonstrating his value when he link man for Samaras, who exchanged passes with him before striding in and tucking away Celtic's third of the afternoon in the 68th minute.

The three goals without reply made for the most emphatic home win for Strachan's side in 2008. The duck egg in Falkirk's goal column was solely down to Artur Boruc A physique that leaves the Pole looking about as muscular in his yellow goalie top as the squiggy Ardal O'Hanlon is in his figure-hugging super-hero outfit are irrelevances when he proves such an intoxicating presence on the field.

For all that Falkirk were taken apart ultimately, there was an economy about their play that allowed them to make possession count in and around the box by testing Boruc on string of occasions. Three times in the first half, the Celtic keeper seemed to develop a wingspan rather than an armspan to twice block from Michael Higdon and push away a fierce effort from Scott Arfield. Just for good measure he had fine blocks Gerard Aafjes and John Stewart in the second period with the openness of the encounter both suiting Celtic's slick movement and ensuring the visitors were never entirely closed out of the contest.

It is the sort of chance-heavy contest that Celtic supporters are happy to feast over and they purred their appreciation of their team's efforts throughout the second period. Indeed, midway included a delightful piece of skill from Nakamura midway through the second that sparked a mighty roar round the crowd. Such spontaneous glee hasn't been heard much in the 18 months Maloney has been away.





The full article contains 881 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 23 August 2008 11:01 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

Teary Ennui,

24/08/2008 00:13:20
So it was McManus's turn to play basketball this week. It's usually Caldwell. :0)
2

FJM,

USA 24/08/2008 00:45:31
Perhaps I'm just an old-fashioned stickler, but I thought the score was 3-0?
3

sonofcosmos,

glasgow 24/08/2008 00:49:04
#2..nope its usually barry ferguson x
dreadfil to get the score wrong..the papers going to the dogs..xxx
4

Neutral Observer,

24/08/2008 00:59:36
#3 & #4

This is a regular occurance and is such basic sloppiness as to be incredible. Problem may be traced to the fact that a different sub editor composes the headline after the story has been written by the reporter. But there is no excuse for factual inaccuracy like that.
5

Harlem Tam,

24/08/2008 01:13:14
Maloney was outstanding today. Nakamura was simply sublime and Loovens and Crosas look like class. With Rangers looking very poor at Pittodrie, it's looking like a Celtic victory next week.

Great football from Celtic. Shaun is back. Celtic are back. 4 in a row, here we go.
6

Real Men Against Bhoys,

Melbourne 24/08/2008 01:14:50
"Maloney had only been on the field for three minutes when he wriggled and jinked to earn a free-kick, or more accurately bought one, that Shunsuke Nakamura flighted in from the right flank, for Stephen McManus to bundle in, using his arm..." Says it all really.
7

sonofcosmos,

glasgow 24/08/2008 01:18:01
#8 can you trust a match report from murrays main poodles especially one that cant even get the result right !!!! novos dive for rangers free kick which led to their goal is reviewed very differently ..xxx
8

Harlem Tam,

24/08/2008 01:18:17
#8 So funny
9

Harlem Tam,

24/08/2008 01:19:24
Rangers fans can't take the fact that Peter Lawwell has every referee in his back pocket.

So funny.
10

Ajax MacKindling,

24/08/2008 01:46:41
11 Harlem Tam

That seems like an admission that Celtic are cheats. Is that what you meant?
11

Pat the Hat,

Cloud Nine 24/08/2008 01:51:07
That's better, Celtic – who said free-flowing football doesn't work in the SPL?

The murmurs of apprehension, nay fear, from the dark side are growing ever louder, as is evident on this thread. Every decision that goes for Celtic is parsed and analysed for weeks on end – sometimes seasons – and every decision that goes the way of the apron is brushed over and taken as their due, yet still their little bottoms squeak.

How many millions of cash they don't have has Wattie spent now as Murray attempts to justify his crazed ego-tripping? Just think, bears, if he'd spent a fraction of it before the Kaunas game you might still be in Europe, you might still have Ugly Betty, and you might still have a £10m windfall to look forward to. Does the truth hurt or what?

Oh may aching sides!
12

Big Stevie,

Sydneyside 24/08/2008 01:52:43
#8

Your right it says it all about the journalists pathetic attempts to take the gloss off a magnificent second half performance by Celtic and Shaun Maloney in particular.

#12

Celtic have put the SFA on notice that they will no longer tolerate the blatant refereeing bias exhibited towards Rangers for the last 100 or so years and will blow the lid off the hole stinking mess if it continues.

Hence why decisions are now starting to go Celtic's way and againts Rangers some of the time. But don't worry the sinister minister is still doing his bit in the Edmiston Suite.
13

Ajax MacKindling,

24/08/2008 01:56:17
14 Big Stevie "Hence why decisions are now starting to go Celtic's way "

This also seems to be an admission that Celtc are cheating this season. Is that what you meant? Are Celtc cheating this season?
14

Big Stevie,

Sydneyside 24/08/2008 02:02:46
15

Tell me in what language is this an admission of cheating? It means that referees and assistants are now awarding decisions based on merit and not on how it will affect Gordon Smith's favoured team and as such Celtic are now getting their fair share of 50/50 decisions. Perhaps its the fabled "evening out of decisions" that we've been told about for years. If thats the case you can look forward to Rangers getting nothing for the next 80 years or so.

The fact that every 50/50 Celtic get and Rangers dont is now being anylised to death tells us how this course of events is hurting the gentlemen of the fourth estate.

15

Ajax MacKindling,

24/08/2008 02:16:53
Big Stevie

50/50 is fine. Decisions based on merit are fine.

" decisions are now starting to go Celtic's way and againts Rangers " perhaps doesn't sound like either of those.

Fortunately I'm in no position to argue over the refs decisions over the past 80 to 100 years, and I rather doubt that you are either.
16

Celtic Forever,

No-one likes them, they don't care 24/08/2008 02:23:38
Spot on number 14. At last, the stinkgers are getting their fair share of dodgy decisions and we are getting our fair share of good ones.

When equity exists, class will tell...just look at the table this morning.
17

Chick Young's Toupee,

Blantyre 24/08/2008 02:27:04
17
I was a neutral at the Motherwell Aberdeen game a week past on Saturday. The ref was looking straight at a player who attempted to elbow the Motherwell Captain then headbutt him just afterwards. Nothing done by the referee. They are all incompetent to differing levels. If it was a Celtic player who had elbowed the guy and what not and got away with it, there would be a massive fuss and the ref would be hunted down. The level of scrutiny available after a decision now is much easier due to technology, which isn't available to the ref. Bear this in mind.
18

Big Stevie,

Sydneyside 24/08/2008 02:27:23
Ajax

I can speak for the last 30 years at least and I've heard tell it was even worse before the advent of TV.

Go and look at the Celtic game from yesterday and tell me the ref even had a decision to make regarding the "handball" John Hughes must have been the only person in the ground to see it but Mr English from deep inside Sir Davids back passage manages to squeeze it into his match report.

The situation is that even such a non-event as this is making it into the papers is an indication of the annoyance of some people that Celtic are getting an even share of 50/50 decisions now.

The St Mirren game last week was another example when Celtic were awarded what appeared to me to be a clear cut penalty. After watching a replay iot seemed less clear cut but still looked a penalty to me.

Not to some of the Scottish press like Chick Young, jostling for position with Tom English for first dabs on the rear end , who proceeded to call into question the integrity of the referee and his family background despite having little or nothing to say about McCurrys shennanigans last year.

19

Ajax MacKindling,

24/08/2008 02:45:29
20 Big Stevie

I've already said on the other thread I have no problem with McManus' goal. However the media wants controversy, its reported as a questonable goal on the BBC report too, do you really believe that Murray controls these reports (that would be a wee bit paranoid).

On the St Mirren penalty the ref wanted his cake and ate it too. He allowed a 50/50 challenge to go, then waited until Hesslink missed his shot before awarding a pen...and then send the Mirren boy off. Wanted his cake, ate it and then got afters.

Last week's one was DUs pen. Absolutely no one can explain why DU didn't get a pen there.
20

Big Stevie,

Sydneyside 24/08/2008 03:25:14
21 Ajax

Sadly your wrong the media only wants controversy when the decision benefits Celtic. Prime example of this was when Aberdeen had a goal chalked off at CP a fortnight before helicopter Thursday the media made a huge song and dance about the referee making a mistake but completely neglected to mention the same ref incorrectly chalking off a good Celtic goal earlier in the same game.

On the JVoH incident I suggest you dig out the FIFA rule book as the referee was perfectly correct when after he adjudged the initial fould took place he played advantage and allowed JVoH to get his shot away. Seeing no advantage was forthcoming he puled the play back and correctly awarded a penalty and a red card. Subsequent match reports made a great deal of this but again failed to mention a more clear cut penalty denied to Celtic earlier in the game.

AS far as SDM controlling the media is concerned I dont believe for a minute he controls all the media but he does heavily influence some senior journalists in Scotland as evidenced by the Daily Record championing Rangers rearranging attempts last year.

Succulent lamb anyone.


The DU penalty you speak of was another 50/50. There was contact but the player embelished it by exagerating his fall making the refs decision easy. Funny enough Nakamura was booked for almost the exact same incident on title winning day at the same ground.

You'll have read about that injustice in all the media outlets. Oh no wait a minute.....
21

,

24/08/2008 06:50:26
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
22

Richardinho,

24/08/2008 06:55:43
Sadly, the media hysteria that has been whipped up against Celtic in recent months has encouraged every two bit diddy team to scream blue murder every time they get the slightest decision against them when playing Celtic.
I now expect after every game to hear on the radio some torn-faced diddy team coach greetin into the arms of a blue nosed interviewer.
23

crepes84,

Ayr 24/08/2008 07:40:24
A much more energetic and polished performance from Celtic, a real confidence booster for next week.
I didn’t see the DU penalty live but heard the radio after-match comments and read the Monday reports about stone-wall, blatant etc and watched the Monday night highlights with some trepidation. As was mentioned earlier, it was the same as the Nakamura incident that, wrongly, resulted in Naka getting cautioned.
There was contact from Caldwell, not enough for the player to go down, and he embellished the reaction, not simulated that there was contact. If the referee gave a free kick every time there was contact there would be 12 penalties per game!
From the referee’s position, he decided that the contact didn’t justify the penalty, end of!
24

ess,

24/08/2008 08:19:51
*24. The fact that Celtic are no.1 seems to be upsetting everyone.
4 in a row, here we come.
25

Celtic Bhoy,

Carlisle 24/08/2008 08:33:30
A very good performance by the Champions and great to see the new players fitting in! Magic!
26

a bhoys life,

Dublin 24/08/2008 09:35:13
Watched the match yesterday at paradise & have to say when Maloney was introduced in to the match to partner Samaras following JVoH injury. I was excited. But little did I think how well Maloney & Samaras would link up.......Phenomenal. Their movement & interpassing were a joy to behold & as such releived the pressure on McGeady & Nakamura who in turn lifted thier games....With thes four players on form & understanding we will hurt any & all CL opposition. Nevermind the orcs from the southside..they as usual shall seek to bring mayhem & confusion to our regular contests....but like all who seek to conquer through fear rage & fury they shall be despatched by the grace passion & beauty of the game we love....Football.
27

a bhoys life,

Dublin 24/08/2008 09:40:19
Roll on Thursday...... Roll on Sunday.....Roll on No.4
28

Teary Ennui,

24/08/2008 10:14:20
"Boyd was clearly offside and was interfering with play" (#23)

In which universe? You've got to laugh at stuff like this. It threatens some folks' world-view to think the big refereeing mistakes have gone for Celtic and against Rangers this season and they will point desperately at anything to try to distract from that, even making daft claims about the era before TV!
29

Ajax MacKindling,

24/08/2008 10:43:04
22 Big Stevie,Sydneyside

"The DU penalty you speak of was another 50/50. There was contact but the player embelished it by exagerating his fall making the refs decision easy."

Maybe you should be checking the rule book on this one yourself. There was contact with the DU player, taking his feet from him. There was no contact with the ball at all.
It doesn't matter if the DU player did a triple back somersault with a twist before landing, taking the players feet without getting near the ball makes it a penalty, nothing 50/50 about it.
30

,

24/08/2008 10:45:38
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
31

Survivor Of Riots,

24/08/2008 10:46:51
OK Raging Ranger Syndrome sufferers.

I accept your game of chicken.

Lets play the "refs under the micro-scope" game and see what the overall outcome is.

However, lets do it without the media spin evident in the reporting of the "goal" yesterday. Remember, some of these (so called) journo's see nothing wrong with mentioning the ref's surname in a sleekit manner....he's got an Irish surname, surely a tim! If ever the term "supporters with typewriters/laptops" was apt, it is for this group of Raging Ranger SYndrome Sufferers.

Would be willing to bet that the scrutiny is reduced when normal service is resumed and ReaRangers start to get the bulk of the decisions.

Its a game you wont win.

32

Teary Ennui,

24/08/2008 10:55:25
"Boyd was standing in an offside position. The question is whether or not he was 'interfering with play'. Given that he was standing in front of the goals drawing aberdeen players towards him, I would say that he was." (#32)

So anybody who happens to be marked by an opposition player near the goal is active in play? Don't be daft.
33

Richardinho,

24/08/2008 10:59:53
Boyd may be a lazy bassa, but if he's standing in front of goals he's surely interfering with play. No one was marking Beasley because they were being drawn towards Boyd.
34

Survivor Of Riots,

24/08/2008 11:00:41
34 - the Riot Survivor watched the game at Pittodrie yesterday before the Celtic game.

In the spirit of fairness, I can concur with your comments.

For clarity...at no point in yesterdays game did Kris Boyd come remotely close to interfering with play.

35

Teary Ennui,

24/08/2008 11:11:51
#35,

Just being around the goal with someone marking you is not being active in play. There's often a lot of players near the goal being marked but when the ball is put in the net by someone who is well away from them they should not be given offside.
36

Richardinho,

24/08/2008 11:31:40
'Just being around the goal with someone marking you is not being active in play.'

Well if that doesn't it's hard to know what does!
37

Teary Ennui,

24/08/2008 11:44:22
Playing the ball, attempting to play the ball, etc. Not standing well away from the actual action.
38

The Sheriff,

24/08/2008 11:56:50
Teary,why are you discussing a matter not related to the game in this report? Go and dry your eyes sonny.
39

me-here,

home 24/08/2008 11:58:18
#39 Teary Ennui

So you're here now.
Why are you arguing about this again.
By the way, it was "active".
Interfering with play does not mean the ball has to be touched.
So don't read Wikipedia because it is not correct.
Look at Maloney/Samaras. That is how you play without an offside position.


40

Teary Ennui,

24/08/2008 11:59:40
"Interfering with play does not mean the ball has to be touched" (#41)

Never said it was mate. Quite the reverse in fact - read #39 again.
41

me-here,

home 24/08/2008 12:07:38
But this is really exciting.

Maloney signs and a day later he plays like he has been with the Bhoys for weeks.
How is this gonna be next week.
McGeady - Maloney - Nakamura - Samaras!
Magic - Magic - Magic - Goal!
42

Richardinho,

24/08/2008 12:16:38
Think we should play five in midfield. two up front.
Mcgeady,and Naka on the wings, Maloney, Brown and Hartley in the middle, McDonald and JVH up front.

This side would destroy Rangers.
43

me-here,

home 24/08/2008 12:19:38
Gordon Strachan about Maloney - "I don’t know how well he is going to play, but......"

I like that one!
44

me-here,

home 24/08/2008 12:22:08
#44 Richardinho

Don't think so. Looks a bit daft with JVoH & McDonald up front in wheelchairs.
Allthough, we still could win it.
But better use the healthy players.
45

Richardinho,

24/08/2008 12:24:45
#46 you're right, Weir and Daily would feel too much at home if they were surrounded by folk in wheelchairs!
46

me-here,

home 24/08/2008 12:32:27
47 Richardinho

Be careful. We don't want to upset the gers to much.
They are already being treated unfairly enough.

Allthough - hahahahahaha
47

Braesbear,

24/08/2008 12:48:04
InTIMidation has risen to new levels. Celtic benefit in every match of the season so far.
What are the odds on a dodgy decision next week I wonder.
48

Helter Skelter,

24/08/2008 14:01:11
------------------BORUC--------------------

CADDIS----LOOVENS---MCMANUS--------WILSON

-----------------HARTLEY----------------

NAKAMURA----MALONEY---BROWN------MCGEADY

---------------SAMARAS------------------

But I expect that Strachan will start with Hinkel.
He played well yesterday, but I still have quite a few doubts about him, particularly if Novo starts.
Caddis would be a better match for Novo as he has pace.
49

KingKenny,

24/08/2008 14:03:48
First goal is worst Decision. referee help Celtic. but Maloney is outstanding. Falkirk unlucky. Hope they revenge next game
50

jerrymanders,

24/08/2008 20:01:31
#52

Help. Need you. Pregnant Fish.
51

jerrymanders,

24/08/2008 20:02:16
oops!

#51

Me help, too.
52

Royalty,

Zandvoort 25/08/2008 11:31:24
For years cfc fans have waged a propoganda war on spl officials & it now seems to have had the desired effect.

In order to avoid bricks through windows, coins hitting heads, private lives & background checks, the officials now go for the easy option & favour cfc.

spl - cfc - tartan army = scotlands shame.
53

nineinro,

25/08/2008 11:58:09
49
If it is anything like the last two OF games at the house of shame then Rangers can expect tae be kicked off the park and then be reduced tae 10 men and concede a penalty outside the box ... who knows we might still get a result?
54

nineinro,

25/08/2008 12:00:26
50
Has Chesney discovered anti-football?
55

me-here,

Scotland 25/08/2008 20:03:24
McGeady - Maloney - Nakamura - Samaras

=

Magic - Magic - Magic - Goal
56

me-here,

Scotland 25/08/2008 20:05:30
# 51 KingKenny

Post you is worst post since begin - no good write - no make sense - stop

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.