Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 16th November 2008 Change Date

Free Gerhard Richter Print

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Spin doctor sidelined for Mandelson



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 October 2008
PETER Mandelson returned to the Cabinet last week on the condition that Gordon Brown move his chief spin doctor to a backroom job.
Brown's reshuffle included the move of spokesman Damian McBride into a less high- profile role at Downing Street.

Senior Labour sources last night said that Mandelson had insisted McBride be sidelined, following growing complaints from many Labour MPs about his briefing style.

The move to sideline McBride is being seen by ministers as a clear sign that Mandelson will play a hugely significant role as Brown's chief adviser, in much the same way as he did for Tony Blair.

They also now fear that the move might trigger a backlash from Brown's close allies if they think they are being sidelined by Mandelson. Last night one newspaper claimed Mandelson had poured "pure poison" about Brown into the ears of a senior Tory just weeks before rejoining the Cabinet.

And the Prime Minister's closest Cabinet ally, Schools Secretary Ed Balls, who is understood to have lobbied against Mandelson's return, declared the move was a "risk".

Mandelson himself told a newspaper last night that he and Brown would be "joined at the hip" from now on. The Business Secretary acknowledged that his relations with Brown had been "a bit combative, probably a bit prickly" at times, but insisted they had "never entirely lost our friendship".

In another sign of how wide Brown may be prepared to cast his net in recruiting to the Cabinet, another newspaper claimed the Prime Minister was considering how he might bring David Blunkett back.

Among the casualties of the reshuffle, McBride is a long-time servant of the Prime Minister and moved from the Treasury along with him last year.

However, Mandelson is said to loathe him, and has argued with Brown recently that he needs to be deposed.

Alastair Campbell and even Neil Kinnock are also understood to have called for the changes to Brown's Downing Street operation, which has received much of the blame for the chaos at Number 10 in recent months.

One senior Labour source said that Mandelson's influence over Brown had been growing for months. "They have been speaking pretty much every day. Eventually, Gordon just decided, if we are speaking every day, I should just get you in the Cabinet."

The insider said that McBride first had to go. "That was a condition of the deal. I don't think without it he would have come back."

One Cabinet minister said that the moves would be welcomed. "Gordon has been very badly advised. That will now change."

However, Balls gave a less than enthusiastic response yesterday to the changes.

He said: "Of course it's a risk, but at the same time it's also a great opportunity for our country and our Government. Gordon Brown looked at this carefully and he decided it was worth that risk, and I think that was the right thing to do."

Other sources said that Alastair Campbell had emerged as a key player in Mandelson's return.

Blair's former spin doctor was "intimately involved" in discussions to bring Mandelson back to the Cabinet last week, according to one senior figure.

Another minister said: "Both Alastair and Neil Kinnock have been giving advice to Gordon over the changes to the backroom team. There was a dysfunction there that had to change."

Along with Mandelson, the return of Campbell to Brown's inner circle of advisers reunites three of the four key figures in the original New Labour team – with just Tony Blair on the fringes.

Labour slips

A NEW poll has suggested Labour could lose 164 seats in the next general election, giving the Conservatives victory with a majority of 78.

Polling group ICM interviewed around 1,000 people in the 192 Labour-held seats where Tories are in second place and require a swing of 15% or less to win. Some 43% of voters questioned said they would vote Tory, against 34% for Labour and 15% for the Liberal Democrats. Some 50% thought David Cameron would make the best prime minister, while only 35% preferred Gordon Brown. However, 58% thought Brown should stay on as Prime Minister for now, against 36% who said he should step down.

The full article contains 706 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 05 October 2008 12:29 AM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Labour Party
 
1

subrosa,

05/10/2008 00:42:17
Oh dearie me. See the headlines in the Times. That will give a glimpse of Mandelson's attitude to his new job and his new boss.
2

subrosa,

05/10/2008 00:43:48
For those who can't access the Times:

Martin Ivens, Jonathan Oliver and Isabel Oakeshott
Peter Mandelson “dripped pure poison” about Gordon Brown into the ear of a senior Conservative just weeks before his extraordinary cabinet come-back, it was claimed last night.

Mandelson is alleged to have laid out a long and detailed critique of the prime minister’s failings in a private conversation with a leading member of David Cameron’s top team.

In addition, Mandelson, who was summoned back to government last week as business secretary, warned that Brown was vulnerable to the charge that he had presided over a “culture of debt”.

It was exactly this criticism of Labour that became the main theme of the Tory conference in Birmingham last week.

RELATED LINKS
Supergroup, or a sad tribute act?
Mischievous Mandy drops another brick
MULTIMEDIA
Peter Mandelson's Cabinet return
The senior Conservative spoke of his shock at Mandelson’s extreme candour. “He poured out pure poison about Brown,” he said. “It was not like a passing thing. He had really thought it through.”

The revelation will cast doubt on the prime minister’s decision to bring back a controversial figure who was twice forced to resign amid scandal. It also exposes the fragility of the truce between Brown and Mandelson, who were until recently sworn political foes.

Last night Mandelson denied he had criticised Brown. “It is a totally baseless piece of fiction made up in the Tory party propaganda unit,” he said. However, The Sunday Times was aware of the “poison” conversation well before his surprise return to cabinet.

Ed Balls, the schools minister, yesterday admitted it had been a “risk” to offer him a peerage and place him at the heart of the government’s battle to contain the financial crisis. Yesterday it also emerged that:
- The prime minister “repeatedly appealed” to a sceptical Mandelson, urging him to take the cabinet position.
- Brown was forced to clear his closest advisers ou
3

ochone,

Sauchie,Clack's 05/10/2008 01:22:13
And so it begins
4

donald,

glasgow 05/10/2008 01:39:18
Doesn't say much for the rest of the failed numpties when Broon has to appoint a publicly discredited crook to fill a vacancy.
5

donald,

glasgow 05/10/2008 01:56:23
This keeps coming up when I click on the online poll. I vote NO anyways.
6

LEAL,

05/10/2008 07:19:23
Will Mandelson be campaigning in Glenrothes?Will Brown?Will there ever be a byelection?Do we have confirmation that it will be held on Nov 6 to be hidden by the US election?
7

Walter Ego,

Durness 05/10/2008 08:02:49
McBride has been "sidelined" because he is useless.
8

Peter Curran,

Kirkliston 05/10/2008 08:09:00
Brown's desperation and political cowardice is yet again on display, in his appointment of Mandelson and in his recourse to Alastair Campbell in an unofficial capacity. The school coward has invited the school bullies into his home in the vain hope that they will protect him.

If the Parliamentary Labour Party does not repudiate Brown for this folly, they will lose what little credibility and respect they have from their dwindling support in the country.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=giUZYyxKE0g
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ey-5ymkm784
9

bluehead,

edinburgh 05/10/2008 11:10:46
per auld broonie!!!he never learns,the people just have to look at mandelson to be put of even further by the labour pile, I read somewhere he wanted to be joined at the waste with broonie,I would of thought it would have been more of a pleasure to cuddled by rattlesnake,the labour party is now more than ever on it's way to extinction,as governments go ,this must be the biggest bunch of clowns in political history
10

W U Merchant,

Aberdeen 05/10/2008 12:11:53
Seems a daft move to me but check the latest bookies' prices for the next general election - the Tories are on the drift.
11

Dr Finlay,

Tannochbrae 05/10/2008 13:55:09
If a doctor , or a teacher, or a policeman, or any other public service professional, was sacked from two jobs for unprofessional conduct, do you think that it would be acceptable for them to return to a similar job? The public would never allow it, but it seems that politics is different.

I wonder why? Is it because they are so much better than the rest of us or so much worse?
12

Alberto.,

05/10/2008 14:35:44
This Mandleson / New Labour 're-marriage'is so typical of New Labours attitude to not only having many dubious politicians in 'their' Club but insisting on 'No matter what the crime'they will not lose out!

They must be the most corrupt Governement the Country has, and hopefully will ever see!

They are of course now in their death throes, and nobody will be sorry to see them Go!Go! Go! -
soonest!

13

James.com,

05/10/2008 15:24:43
Salmond should have thought of this one. The UK is saved (isn't it? )
14

Guga II,

Rockall 05/10/2008 17:18:19
Mr. Editor,

I see the Hootsmon On-line poll has been got at, again.

It has gone from an 82% No vote this morning to an unbelievable 85% Yes vote this afternoon.

Either someone at the Hootsmon is fiddling with the figures, or, due to the incompetence of your IT staff, there have been a few Labour supporters indulging in massive multiple voting. The latter being possible as your site allows for such multiple voting.

If the Hootsmon is unble to conduct an honest and reliable poll, perhaps you shouldn't bother.
15

brownlie,

05/10/2008 18:57:00
I hope that they don't show a video of Brown and Manderson "joined at the hip" on U-tube.
16

First Minister,

Markinch 05/10/2008 19:39:55
GUGA II
I was online last year and in front of my very eyes, a poll which asked "would Jack McConnell make a better FM than Alex Salmond", move from 89% against to 75% in the other direction right in front of me, it was bizarre to say the least, i was also at a SOS Debate on The Union last May, and yet again SOS lied over the % in favour of Self-Determination.Pravda? Or Nat Paranoia?
17

nivelon,

France 06/10/2008 13:25:31
Delendum Mandelson Est.

He has been brought back, along with Alistar Campbell, not for inner-UKanian reasons, but to attack any attempt to reorganise the bankrupt world monetary system. We shall shortly see him Special Envoy to the about-to-be-convened New Bretton Woods Conference.

And his role will be as Wrecker.

One might ask Dr. David Kelly for his view, were he still around to be asked.

That the Monarch have seen fit to approve Lord Mandy's peerage serves only to prove - if proof were needed - that the Monarchy too, must go.

DELENDUM MANDELSON EST.
18

Jingsitsme,

EDINBURGH 06/10/2008 17:00:43
he is an awful man is Mandelson. A creep of the highest degree and one person I would never like to have dinner with.

The last straw as far as Labour is concerned taking him back.

Feed him to the lions......

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.