Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 16th November 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Hearts memorial to war dead 'cannot be sidelined'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 28 September 2008
THEY were a team of outstanding players who took Heart of Midlothian to the top of the Scottish League.
But in November 1914, at the height of their careers, 13 of the players chose to leave Scotland and fight for their country, signing up to the 16th Royal Scots Battalion. Of the 13 who left for the front, only six returned.

In memory of the player
s, known as McCrae's Battalion, a clock and war memorial were donated to the city by the football club in 1922, and they have become a landmark at the centre of Haymarket junction in Edinburgh's west end and a symbol of pride for Hearts fans.

But to make way for tram works the memorial will be moved to a side street near Haymarket, and Scotland on Sunday can reveal it may never return to its original site.

Hearts supporters have branded the move "disgraceful" as the historic monument is swept aside, and they have formed a protest group to launch a campaign to protect the memorial's position.

Edinburgh councillors are also joining the campaign to get the memorial put back in time for next year's Remembrance Day, when wreaths are traditionally laid at the foot of the monument.

The memorial will be temporarily moved to Atholl Crescent, a nearby street parallel with Shandwick Place.

But despite an artist's impression that shows the memorial returned to the site, Edinburgh City Council has claimed it was never a formal plan to replace it and architects are looking into permanently relocating it to the less prominent position of Atholl Crescent.

A report from Cre8 Architecture, contracted by Transport Initiatives Edinburgh, show plans to position the memorial in the quiet Atholl Crescent permanently, "rather than it merely being a clock in the middle of an ever-busier road junction".

The report goes on to propose making the relocated memorial one of 25 visitor attractions on a 'Statue and Monument trail'.

Hearts supporters have reacted angrily to the idea of permanently moving the monument, which the football club was not consulted on, and have formed the Friends of the Heart of Midlothian War Memorial to lobby for its reinstatement.

Iain MacLeod, a leading activist in the campaign, said a permanent move from Haymarket would be "disgraceful".

John Longmuir, the secretary of the Glasgow Hearts Supporters' Club added: "This is a non-debate. The memorial either resides permanently at Haymarket or the club houses it at Tynecastle. Any other idea is a non-starter."

Former Hearts chairman George Foulkes said he was appalled by the idea of permanent removal.

Foulkes said: "It is symbolic at Haymarket, it should not be tucked away in a corner of the city. "It should be properly acknowledged in its traditional home as a focal point at Haymarket, and of course the annual Remembrance Service in November at Haymarket is one of the most important events in Hearts' calendar."

Jack Alexander, author of McCrae's Battalion, a history on the group, said: "I know an old lady who has pointed out that the stones surrounding the Haymarket memorial were covered by the tears of people who attended the Remembrance Day ceremony there.

"The people who built it wanted it to be visible at all times, as it is at the Haymarket junction. We have a responsibility to them."

Edinburgh councillors Ian Murray and Ricky Henderson have joined the fight to reinstate the memorial and will appeal to the council at next month's meeting to do the work as quickly as possible so the memorial can be removed after Remembrance Day this year and replaced before next year's occasion.

An Edinburgh Council spokeswoman stressed no final decision had been made. She said: "We will do our best to ensure it sits in a place which makes most people happy."

Hearts football club, which is at a sensitive stage of negotiations with the council over the £51m redevelopment of Tynecastle Stadium, has not made its position clear in the row. Officials will meet members of the Save Our Hearts campaign tomorrow.



The full article contains 680 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Private Pike,

28/09/2008 01:25:22
John Longmuir. Who's he? The memorial must be reinstated at Haymarket as soon as possible. It should not be moved to Tynecastle. The club gave it to the City and to hide the memorial away in Tynecastle would be an insult to the memory of the brave men who did not make it back home. It must remain as a tribute that can be appreciated by all of Edinburgh.
2

Robert Dunn,

Edinburgh 28/09/2008 05:30:57
What is the name of the Edinburgh Council spokeswoman?
Is she ashamed to reveal her name? When she says "We" does that mean 100% of the Edinburgh Council?
I find her remarks insipid .It contains no guaramntee that his memorial to men who gave their all that we might remain free. Who can dare desecrate their, their families and our the Scottish People's honour by moving this piece of our hreritage to another place that, in her grosssly insensiticve choice of words "a place whcich maj=kes most people happy"
3

StockportJambo,

28/09/2008 07:00:40
I would have thought that the place that keeps "most people happy" would be exactly where it is, has always been, and forever should be. Lest we forget.

Leave it the hell alone. Edinburgh City Council have no moral right to touch it. If it causes problems for the tramlines... tough. Deal with it. Work around it.

Maybe they want to move the castle as well? How about Holyrood?

Nah... thought not.

To borrow a North of England word that is appropriate in this situation... Numpties.
4

beeree,

28/09/2008 07:17:38
What a disgraceful proposition.
5

JT,

28/09/2008 09:46:24
This is a war memorial, not just another of Edinburgh's statues for the tourists that could be moved. No matter its links with Hearts this is part of the whole city's history and should be treated with the rightful respect. It must remain in its current location no matter what happens with the unwanted trams. How many tourists or councillors for that actually know what this means to people even after all this time? Hands off our memorial!!!
6

ConnorD,

28/09/2008 10:58:00
This is a prime example of the arrogance and disrespect shown by the organisers, government and council over this whole tram project. This memorial actually means something to the families of those who sacrified their lifes for this city and this country and all this awful faceless nameless council spokeswoamn can think to say is a quote which is suferficial and offensive.
I know that Councillors and officials read these posts (some actually contribute!!!)and will know who this manderin is who made these comments. I trust she will be appearing in front of someone's desk tomorrow in a place where she will NOT be happy.
7

Tynietiger,

28/09/2008 11:55:34
My mole in Council tells me that SNP councillor Tom Buchanan tried to get an emergency debate (to save Haymarket location) at last month's full Council Meeting but Hibs supporting business convener denied this.
8

John.S,

Edinburgh 28/09/2008 12:12:14
To consider relocating the Memorial away from Haymarket is quite simply appalling; shame on any Council official who thinks it would be the right thing to do. May I also take this opportunity to remind the Elected Members of the Council of their duty to represent the people of Edinburgh, so they should never forget what the Memorial means for the City of Edinburgh, and for the memory of those it is placed there for.

Please keep the Memorial in a highly prominent position at Haymarket.
9

loosehead,

Edinburgh 28/09/2008 12:13:55
The architects contracted by TIE describe the memorial as "another clock in the middle of an ever-busier junction." Would they move the Cenotaph because it is just another block of stone in the middle of ever-busier Whitehall? I think not - but then that`s London. The "obstruction" at Haymarket is a memorial to the fallen - not just "another clock." What an example of the crass, soulless, insensitive mindset of the architects and planners who are bent on ruining our environment. As for post #7, I find it difficult to believe that there is an Easter Road based conspiracy at work. I am a Hibs supporter, and I am sure that 99% will feel as I do.
10

Talk o' the Toun,

28/09/2008 12:26:19
#9 good post ...not a Hearts/Hibs issue.
11

Forward not Back,

28/09/2008 13:19:23
Edinburgh Council should be ashamed for even considering hiding the landmark of Haymarket.
12

Jamboree,

Contalmaison 28/09/2008 21:13:39
Shame on those in power who would even contemplate such a sacreligious proposal to relocate the Haymarket Memorial!! Those brave men fought and died to allow us the freedom we ALL enjoy today. It's up to ALL of us to ensure we exercise that freedom to ensure that the Haymarket Memorial remains at Haymarket. Edinburgh Councillors should be under NO illusion - remove the memorial and WE WILL REMOVE THEM FROM OFFICE.
13

Reg, Perth WA,

29/09/2008 02:01:40
The people of Athol Crescent should be fearful!
Is this area to become a dumping ground for obstructive monuments!
There is a large refugee from St Andrew's Square there already.
Can anyone remind me of that monument's reason and history?
14

Kate,

Zurich 29/09/2008 09:44:21
#9 Loosehead, well put!

This is a memorial, not just any old clock tower. The men who died were not just football players, but men of honour, who deserve the highest accolade. To be shifted to a side street is disgraceful.
15

choose a name,

29/09/2008 18:09:17
The Council should make it clear what it's plans are for this important war memorial rather than slip it through quietly as a temporary, but soon to become permanent, relocation in the interest of a white elephant of a tram scheme. Shame on them!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Would the new Hearts stadium plan lead to overcrowding problems?
Yes, emergency vehicles would struggle to get in.
Yes, but these could be fixed by banning cars on match days.
No, there’s still plenty of space left for more fans.

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.