Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Terry Murden: Swallow that national sentiment – the game was up for HBOS long ago



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 02 November 2008
WITHIN weeks theshareholders of Lloyds TSB and HBOS will pass their verdict on the merger of the two banks, and despite more talk of a rival bid and minor concerns in the latest official inquiry into the proposal, the deal as proposed looks certain to go ahead.
The Office of Fair Trading has warned of a loss of competition, but that hardly came as a surprise. It was the factor that stopped the two coming together prior to the crisis that engulfed the banking sector. The OFT report contains a lot of huff and
puff but will not blow the house down and, as expected, there is to be no referral to the Competition Commission.

One lingering issue is whether HBOS could survive independently with Government support. But with a funding gap of £198bn – far greater than any other UK bank – it was clearly dependent on wholesale funds which seized up and which remain restricted. In a sector that had fattened itself on its gluttony for credit, one or more of its participants had to go and HBOS was the sacrificial lamb. There remains little reason to believe HBOS could stand alone for long without inviting another partner some time soon.

Those still campaigning for the Scottish bank to remain independent overlook the commercial logic, preferring to feast on national sentiment. The Dutch suffered a similar blow to national pride when Royal Bank of Scotland, Fortis and Santander swooped on ABN Amro, but no one was dispatched from Holyrood to offer condolences on behalf of the Scottish people. With a by-election looming, it may be too cynical to detect a little self-interest in this groundswell of political support for HBOS.

The "leading" business people attempting to stop the merger are more conspicuous by who is not among their number. Those who have so far spoken include one former HBOS executive – Jim Spowart – an estate agent and SNP supporter Sir Tom Farmer. Who else is speaking up for it? Where are those who also got fat on its largesse?

The latest rumour that an overseas bidder is showing interest takes us back to this newspaper's report on September 21, the first Sunday after the merger was announced. There was some tentative interest, not least because HBOS was seen as a rare opportunity for a big player to get a foothold in the UK and Europe. An overseas bank would also avoid the competition issue. But in truth, few banks could find the cash to splash around on acquisitions.

Subsequently, this newspaper reported that two London-based financiers, one believed to be an investment banker, were looking to bring in a third party. But no one has yet put their head above the parapet.

One concern is that "overseas" interest may include those with plenty of money but offering little or no transparency in their dealings. Would it really be better for Scotland if HBOS was run by a Middle Eastern fund with little or no accountability to anyone but itself? Against that option, Lloyds TSB looks like a friend indeed.

The big shareholders in both banks – and there is some cross-shareholding – are in favour of the deal. And why not? Let's not forget that these two banks had been talking about a merger for two years. HBOS knew the game was up that long ago.

The row over Lloyds TSB directors getting nine of the 11 boardroom jobs should also come as little surprise. It was stated here weeks ago that the HBOS executives would be overlooked. After all, why would anyone create a new bank out of the directors of a failed one?

Insurance industry bullish about crunch

THE insurance industry cannot shake off speculation that it may be the next sector to suffer from the credit crunch, though the numbers coming out would suggest otherwise.

Philip Scott, the finance director at Aviva, told me last week that despite a dip in the capital surplus, the company – best known for its Norwich Union brand – remained strong and that it could easily withstand any further shocks.

Sandy Crombie echoed that statement on behalf of Standard Life. Trevor Matthews, who has just completed 100 days as chief executive of Friends Provident, is sitting on a surplus that has held up entirely – a unique situation – and FP's focus on fixed income investments rather than equities has turned up trumps.

Rather than worry about credit markets, there is now a focus on a further round of consolidation which may encourage investors to buy into the sector.





The full article contains 769 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Max FM,

02/11/2008 02:07:26
Why must the deal be done and dusted? I don't understand why the government is trying to railroad this through! - why will labour loan money to all banks, except HBOS unless it merges with Lloyds (with the vast majority of jobs losses coming from Scotland)?

If there is another bidder, let them show their hand and then we all can decide on what is best for Scotland's banking sector, HBOS shareholders and staff.
2

JoeMiddleton,

Edinburgh 02/11/2008 09:04:43
It's up to the shareholders who I hope will vote no and resists this dreadful deal where the minnow swallows the whale at a knock down price.

HBOS's HQ being moved south and the loss of thousands of Scottish jobs is not in our national interests. Labour should hand their head in shame for their actons.
3

Jocky,

Aberdeen 02/11/2008 09:26:31
Notwithstanding the sentimental outcry at seeing this long standing symbol of Scotland disapppearing without a trace, the hard facts are that HBOS really is a basket case and with the colossal funding gap there really is no option but the Lloyds/TSB rescue take over/mercy killing, whichever you want to call it. The level of mismanagement by the HBOS board was staggering, and who had the audacity to say right up to the end that HBOS had no funding issues!! I advocate that all Banks must now go back to only being able to fund lending from their available deposits, period, this is the only way that a repeat of this funding debacle will not happen again. People have short memories and in 3-4 years time this will all become a distant memory for the next wave of board room fat cats desperate to get rich quick on 7 figure salaries.
4

The Strategist,

02/11/2008 15:40:13
"People have short memories and in 3-4 years time this will all become a distant memory for the next wave of board room fat cats desperate to get rich quick on 7 figure salaries."

Yep.. Agree completely with that which is why I don't think we should give them the chance. Lets set up a mutually owned Bank for Scotland and to hell with both HBOS and RBS as well as Lloyds TSB!!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.