Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Final statement: Greedy banks are shedding crocodile tears for savers



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 November 2008
IF THE banks were hoping to emerge from the economic crisis with any sense of integrity or decency intact, they blew it last week.
At a time when the powers that be, from politicians to the Bank of England, finally seize the truth that this calamity is too grave for posturing and grandstanding, the banks couldn't resist showing their true colours.

Naturally, it would have b
een nicer if our betters could have been born to superior perception, rather than had it thrust upon them. But when officials at the Bank of England finally bit the bullet, in what could only be seen as a humiliating U-turn, surely the mortgage banks should have done the decent thing and swallowed the medicine too.

Am I alone in wondering what has happened to bankers? During the last recession, they moved mountains to protect housebuyers by pegging mortgage rates below the prevailing base rate. Savers didn't like it. But it's swings and roundabouts in this game of money. At some stages of the cycle, savers win; at other times, the interests of borrowers should be paramount.

But this common-sense approach to looking after customers has gone. Instead, the banks shed crocodile tears about savers today. Well, it just won't wash. It's hardly a secret that most savers sit in accounts paying derisory rates, languishing well below base rate. I never see savings institutions wasting tears on the poor savers then, as they rob them blind.

So now interest rates are back to the level of the mid-1950s. It was a time of great social and political change as Britain emerged from post-war austerity. Something tells me that today we could be at just such a turning point.

But sadly, the agony of economic incompetence has a long lead. The latest insolvency figures make shocking reading, with their implications for rising unemployment. House prices continue to tumble, with the Halifax reporting a further 2.2% drop in October. During the last recession, unemployment continued to rise for two full years after rates were cut sharply in 1991. The jobless numbers didn't peak until 1993, and they didn't drop below a million for nearly another 10 years. On this basis we should expect unemployment to continue climbing until 2010. And they may not reach acceptable levels again until 2019.

Home Report hell

THOSE whom the Gods would destroy, they first make mad. The Bank of England's base rate cut to its lowest level since the early 1950s shows it believes the housing market is close to self-destruction. For the Scottish Government to choose this moment to introduce the potentially most value-destroying change imaginable into the house purchase process has to be madness on a scale which would defy even the most malicious of our celestial tormentors.

From December 1, Home Reports will be introduced in Scotland, primarily to cure a barrel of ills that the market resolved a few years ago.

At the very least these reports will introduce hundreds of pounds of extra costs, when raising the bare minimum essential to move house can be nigh impossible. This will force more families into repossession, or encourage hard-pressed homeowners to hand back their keys and walk away, because they don't have the money to commission a report and try to sell their way out of trouble.

But the damage only begins there. To introduce a compulsory valuation into these packs when surveyors are already suffering acute panic attacks over where they should pitch values can only subject house prices to further slash and burn.

When house prices are falling, valuers' primary concern is that they do not leave themselves open to litigation from mortgage lenders. So they err on the over-cautious side.

What chance does anyone have of achieving a decent price for their home when the law obliges them to include in a pack they themselves hand to a potential buyer a document pricing the property at a fraction of what the seller believes it to be worth? Negative equity will soar.

There will be even more catastrophic news for families forced to move in a hurry if the worst predictions of job losses following restructuring at the banks and other financial services companies are realised. The Edinburgh property market, already awash with unsold homes, will be flooded.

It is currently taking more than three months on average to find a buyer, yet after three months these valuations are worthless, because no lender will accept them. More valuations will be required, more hundreds of pounds wasted.

But the truth is few lenders will accept them anyway in the current nervous market, and will only trust their own surveyor's report.

I know it's late in the day, but I urge readers to write or e-mail their Members of the Scottish Parliament urgently and demand they at least put back plans for this piece of insanity.





The full article contains 828 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 09/11/2008 03:48:36
From the Independent:

Three-hundred senior staff from a bank rescued with billions of pounds of taxpayers' money were treated to a £330,000 champagne break where they laughed at hardup borrowers facing repossession, it was claimed last night.

HBOS mortgage specialists were put up in five-star hotels for the lavish company bash on Friday night, and the bill for the "Annual Star Gala" included £60,000 for hotel rooms, £200-a-head four course meals, £45,000 in travel expenses and a £4,000 champagne reception.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/hbos-staff-on-champagne-break-1004111.html
2

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 09/11/2008 04:32:15
"Home Report hell"

What utter rubbish, as the system currently stands the buyer must pay for the survey. That means a house that is on the market may have as many as 10 separate surveys conducted before it is sold.

This change may be bad for surveyors but for buyers and sellers it makes it a much easier process to arrange a mortgage and make an offer.
3

Plodjfriss, Hammer of the Numpties,

Edinburgh 09/11/2008 09:57:16
Precisely, #2. Over the last few years house prices have risen to insane levels and we haven't seen much in the way of concern for "hard-pressed home-buyers" who've been taking out mortgages for huge multiples of their income and having to bid 30% or more over the asking prices for houses. I don't recall many newspaper commentators (and Ms Hunter may be one of the few exceptions here) urging people to be cautious in their borrowing. The time has now come for these debts to be settled, and it's going to hurt a lot of people. It's clear that house prices are going to have to fall dramatically, and it's hard to believe that home reports will have a significant effect on the market. It's on the way down, and getting rid of home reports isn't going to save it.
4

nabodican,

Rural Scotland 10/11/2008 22:55:03
Thank goodness I moved home earlier this year before these dreaded reports come in. I certainly would not trust a report commissioned and paid for by someone else. From a sellers point of view I would certainly call the tune for a survey that I had to pay for.
The whole thing is sheer stupidity and should be binned immediately. These numpties in holyrood have better things to do than inflict their stupidity on us.
-- "Or do they"
5

RCro,

Edinburgh 11/11/2008 10:05:21
nabodican, I'm sure if you really wanted, any seller would allow you to also get your own survey out of your own pocket. So you will have lost nothing, but everyone else can use the new better system without waiting for stick-in-the-muds like youself to move into the 21st century.
6

A Homeowner,

Crieff 11/11/2008 13:18:23
I wonder what exactly Ms Hunter would suggest is a "decent price" for a home. Decent prices for houses are a distant memory at this stage. But not for long.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.