Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 16th November 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Chris Hoy: IOC should ban drugs cheats like Chambers for life



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 July 2008
CHRIS Hoy, Scotland's Olympic gold-medal winning cyclist, writes exclusively for Scotland on Sunday...
WITH only a matter of weeks before the Olympics begin, it is an exciting time for top athletes and an exciting time for sports fans. It should be a positive time for sport but instead, with a decision still pending on the Dwain Chambers situation,
Team GB continues to be dogged by the negative.

It is a never a good time for the focus to be on drugs cheats – they undermine their sport, their team-mates and their country – but until the courts decide whether they are going to uphold the British Olympic Association (BOA) byelaw banning athletes who have been caught using drugs from competing for the nation in the world's most prestigious multi-sport event, the unfortunate fact is that Chambers will continue to occupy the minds and stories of the media, and therefore the thinking of the public.

The hope is he will not be allowed to travel to Beijing and that everyone can start to concentrate on the clean athletes who are aiming to do themselves and their country justice and hopefully bring back as many medals as possible.

For me, it was a simple decision to join over a hundred British competitors, past and present, in writing a letter of support for the BOA byelaw. It is not a personal attack on Dwain, it is about the principle and my own strongly-held belief that we need to have the toughest possible deterrents if we are ever going to eradicate the illegal use of drugs in our sports and give people who are considering cheating a reason to think twice.

The fact is, the majority of people who compete in Beijing will be clean. I believe that. Some people may think I am being naive and it may vary from sport to sport but I look about the cycle track and I look at my main rivals and I am sure in my own mind that they don't take drugs. But that doesn't stop the innuendo and that's because of the drugs cheats. They have tarnished the sport's reputation and that annoys me.

Drugs cheats don't just risk their own reputation, they try to deprive honest, dedicated athletes of the medals they deserve and they deprive youngsters of worthwhile role models. And what's the punishment? A year or two out the sport. In my opinion that is not enough, especially if the ban is served outwith Olympic years. It would be little or no deterrent if they could continue training, possibly even still taking drugs without having to be tested, before emerging back on to the scene when the ban has been served and walk, run, cycle or swim their way back into the GB team.

There are genuine mistakes, people who take the wrong cough medicine or cold remedy, and they can be viewed differently. But the people not only the BOA but the IOC should be coming down hard on are people, such as Dwain Chambers, who have either been found to be cheating the system for a concerted period of time or those who admit to taking a shopping list of banned substances.

In Chambers case, he admitted taking banned substances for a long period of time and his was a premeditated crime. He knew full well what he was doing. The problem is he wasn't the only one punished. Stripped of the 4x100m relay medal he "won" at the 2003 World Championships, so were his team-mates. That's the problem; a person's decision to cheat always impacts on others.

Despite the fact my event couldn't be any more different from the Tour de France, because we are all cyclists, some people tar is all with the same brush. I have never had anyone accuse me of taking drugs and I would be shocked if anyone ever did, but I am aware of the innuendo which affects cyclists who perform very well.

For me people who resort to banned substances are mentally weak and are losers regardless how many medals they then cheat their way to. If someone takes drugs it is because they don't believe they are good enough to win unaided or they want the easy option. Those of us who believe we are good enough to get to the top of our sports and have proved it, now want something done to ensure people don't thing drug-taking is the easy option. We have to be firm and hit them with a punishment which acts as a true deterrent.

The IOC should be banning drugs cheats for life. They should be leading the way but, in the meantime, I hope the BOA byelaw stands up to the courts' scrutiny. It's nothing personal against Dwain Chambers, I just don't want drugs cheat in the GB team, making a mockery of the Olympic ideals.





The full article contains 828 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 13 July 2008 10:44 AM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: SOS Sports Columnists
 
1

Black Five,

edinburgh 13/07/2008 12:42:49
The man`s done his time.Can nobody reform ? Sounds like the snob brigade are at work.
2

your friendly surveyor,

Edinburgh 13/07/2008 18:17:19
What does morality have to do with snobery?
I am amazed that Dwain Chambers has any supporters at all. He has planned and committed fraud against his sponsors, his supporters and fellow competitors. If sport has no morality, we lose the one thing that keeps me enthralled and glued to my TV whenever any great sporting event is reaching its climax.

I am proud of Chris taking a firm stance on this matter unlike Governing Bodies in the 80's and 90's who knew what was going on but took little or no action to cut it out. If we deviate from the straight line, the next generation will pay the price. Every 14 year old with any sporting ambition should have this article cut out and pinned to their bedroom wall.
3

cheat disliker,

around 14/07/2008 11:24:24
I am pleased that there is some kind of front on this from the sports world.

it is not as if the cheater prior to the drug taking was the same physical entity after the drug taking.

there is no way of ascertaining how much muscle mass was down to the drugs, and therefore how much they have assisted and boosted his performance, even though the drug taking has allegedly ceased.

If the SA para-olympian is not allowed to run in the able-bodied races because they weren't sure how much benefit his carbon fibre feet gave him, DC's additional muscle and aggression from the bottle must have the same rule applied.

DC was/is a cheat, doesn't deserve the chance to race against non-cheats.

it isn't as if the benefit from the crime has been nullified by the sentence. I would vote for a lifetime (or 15 year) ban. Even though he is probably the best hope of a medal, there will always be that cloud and suspicion over him, and it sullies the games.
4

ilan,

Paris, France 14/07/2008 23:51:13
Chris Hoy is a great champion and I salute him. I agree with him that he and his competitors are clean, otherwise, why would they lend each other equipment during championships? On the other hand, I don't believe you should ban people for life, sport is going through a difficult time but one should not go overboard with sanctions. Remember Australian swimming champion Dawn Fraser who in 1964 was banned 10 years for marching in the opening ceremonies, wearing an old swimsuit, refusing to swim a heat, and stealing a flag. That seems ridiculous now, but in those days athletes were not expected to express their individuality and were heavily sanctioned if they did. In other words, one should think about how people in the future will look back at this period.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.