Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 16th November 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Aidan Smith: Deek's scowling countenance puts a big smile on Leith's face



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 07 September 2008
NEVER GO back. That's what they always say. It won't be as good second time round, and you'll only end up tainting the memory. You may be older and you'll hopefully be wiser, but the edge will have gone, or the devilment – the systems-flouting gallusness to try anything. And then the fans who loved you before will be forced to ask themselves: "Did he really score against Hearts from 75 yards with his right foot and follow that the next season with an 80-yarder with the left a
Well, never mind all of that. Welcome back, Deek Riordaninho – goal junkie.

In our heads, the yardages may have been increased and other past feats embellished, but our hearts can be trusted here. They tell us it's a good thing Derek Riordan has r
eturned to Hibs. I've rarely seen so many Hibby grins as I have these past few days. All for a player who could sulk for Scotland.

How we've missed that Riordan mump! It was something to do with the shape of his moany wee face that he rarely smiled. It was also something to do with no-one else being able match his vision or cheek, not even when Hibs had a good team brimming with youthful swagger. First time round, Hibs got mumps and 20 goals a season out of Deek. Celtic only got the mumps.

Was he right to go to Parkhead? I'd have preferred him to have left Scotland to progress his career, like I would all talented strikers from the so-called diddy teams, because playing for Celtic and Rangers, where the goals are easier to come by, doesn't seem like any kind of development. But at the time I thought, fair enough, you're a homeboy, Gordon Strachan has the same north-Edinburgh background, it should work out, good luck – just don't hurt us with one of those thumping goals that belie your scrawny physique, which in a different age would have got you a job advertising the Official Charles Atlas Correspondence Course.

So why did it not happen for Riordan at Celtic? I'm sure if we could turn the clock back two seasons then both parties, manager and player, would do things differently. Strachan called Deek the best finisher at Celtic Park but gave him fewer first-team chances than the Kiwi clodhopper Chris Killen and others like Evander Sno who, although not strikers, would be chucked on late in preference to Riordan to save games.

But what do I know? Well, I do know this: Celtic, over the past few seasons, have played a different game to Hibs under Tony Mowbray and, initially at least, John Collins. By "different" I mean more sophisticated. This is perfectly provable through a combination of the National Weights and Measures Lab, my old school slide-rule and the number I first thought of.

Ultimately, then, Deek was in the wrong place. Of course Easter Road is not the place it was but we'll gloss over that. It's just great to have him back, glower and all, because he's the kind of player we love. He plays like his football used to be about dodging broken glass, turds, hardmen from the neighbouring scheme, the polis, parkies and stout housewifes seeking payment for broken windows (smashed deliberately – his aim was always true). A friend involved in boys' football reports that he once scored 199 goals in a single season for Pilton Sporting Club, including 14 in a cup final.

These are old, old stats. The one that follows him around now concerns the 21 Edinburgh nightclubs from which he's banned. I'm trying to see the positive in this, the way Groucho Marx might, but the truth is it's time Deek got back to doing what he does best. The winner in the next derby will do nicely – left foot or right, I really don't mind.





The full article contains 660 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Private Pike,

07/09/2008 08:20:04
Riordan had two things to contend with when he went to Celtic. 1. He cost practically nothing and was up against players that GS paid a lot of money for. If a manager pays through the nose for a player, he will be preferred to someone who cost nothing. Otherwise, why pay big money in the first place.

2. GS hasn't a clue. The best natural finisher in Scotland cant get a game for a team that at times struggled to score goals...?

Its too easy to say that off field activities were responsible. You only have to look a Scott Brown.

At Hibs he stood out. He attracted interest from other clubs because of the way he played. Box to box, running at the opposition, creating panic, creating chances, scoring a few.

He goes to Celtic and GS displaying all the foorball acumen that relegated Coventry tells Brown, "That's your wee 20 sq yards in the midfield where you play"

So, gone are the very qualities that made Celtic pay the money for him in the first place. It probably needs a Hibs supporter to be aware of this because the OF support have never seen Brown as we have seen him. Blame your manager, not Scott Brown.
2

Private Pike,

07/09/2008 08:23:46
And...
Welcome back Derek Riordan. Yes, another cog in the wheel in the goal machine that is the mighty Hibs.

But what a cog.
3

Private Pike,

07/09/2008 08:27:52
PS. Sorry about the spelling mistakes and remember, if the OF come calling on this thread the only way to discourage them is to completely ignore them. Getting sucked in to trading insults with them is an encouragement.

Anyone who replies in any way to them will ensure that they pollute and ruin this thread like so many others.
4

morningsiderocks,

glenmoriston 07/09/2008 11:17:34
I aint Old Firm by a long chalk, but have you ever asked yourself why strachan didn't play Ratboy when he mabye was the better bet off the bench? Fans can spot a good player and that's why Celtic fans were calling for him to be put on. I think his off-field activities have had more to do with him not being given a run than you would admit.
A matter of time before him and his "mates" are in the papers again.
5

Scotland Uber Unionists,

07/09/2008 11:38:39
Rat boy should have fitted in well at Rhat FC.
6

Private Pike,

07/09/2008 12:30:50
#4 Throughout the history of football there have been players whose off field activities included boozing and punch-ups.

They still played and many of them are legendary. Yes, the OF fans knew he was a good player but GS didn't think he was good enough. You have to wonder about a manager who thinks he has the best striker in Scotland but can't find a place for him in the team. That's the key. I don't believe Riordans' off field activities stopped him being picked. I think that Gordon Strachan couldn't find a place for him in the team.

I also think that that tells you all you need to know about GS.

Clueless!
7

Neutral Observer,

07/09/2008 16:03:27
I am with Private Pike on this issue. I believe Celtic signed Riordan 'just because they could'. He was tapped up by Celtic and Rangers via his agent long before his contract was up. That is why he refused Hibs then offer of £3000 a week to extend his contract and refused to go to any of the 3 or 4 clubs that offered 7 figure sums to Hibs for his transfer. Before Gary O'Connor went to Russia, the same club wanted to but Riordan instead and when he refused to go, they turned their attention to O'Connor. The opportunity to earn £15,000 per week was not for Riordan, living in Scotland was more important.

As for Strachan - he should have thought before he signed Riordan. He already had players who played in the same position, albeit scoring less goals. eg McGeady if its left side - and plenty of central strikers if that's where he would play.

I go back to what I wrote above - he was signed by Celtic 'just because they could'.
8

Dood,

07/09/2008 17:35:38
Have to agree with the above. Bad boys are all over the game and yet play every week, Joey Barton being the most high profile inclusion. Yes, Riordan is a wee ned who keeps bad company, but when he walks onto a football park he's a different proposition.

I remember leaving Easter Road in Jan05. Hibs had just beaten Killie 3-0, Riordan scored the perfect strikers hat-trick and had given a performance rarely seen in Scottish Football. I had just seen the most naturally gifted Scottish Footballer of his generation by a mile.

Riordan didn't lose that. If Strachan honestly believed that his off field 'antics' merited leaving him out then he really is a fool. Sadly, he just couldn't find a place in his team for Deeks (which also makes him a fool).

Anyhows, their loss is our gain. We have Deeks back and I want to see that boy from 2005 again. Give him a couple of weeks to retain his fitness and I honestly believe I will.

GGTTH
9

Dublin 7 Hibby,

Myles away from Dublin 07/09/2008 18:56:17
Aaaaaaahhhhhh, what a nice surprise - a thread with thoughtful comments only. And I agree with all. Scott Brown is a good cas in point - he has had his natural flair curtailed in Glasgow. But the same is true further west - with Whittaker emasculated and Thomson no longer the elegant player he was. It's an OF thing - buy talent and then play it in positions which takes away the reason for buying in the first place. Look at Naismith, Gow, etc why buy, only to neuter?
10

Atlas Fan,

NY 09/10/2008 17:47:01
Charles Atlas is still alive today. Charles Atlas, Ltd. is going to be 80 years old in 2009! Just put in the name on a google search!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.