Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 24th August 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Tom Brown: Let's have Margo's law, and take the lead on assisted suicide


Scrutiny

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
20 July 2008
AS THAT deep-thinking philosopher and piano man Billy Joel declaimed: "I don't care what you say anymore, this is my life." More important, when it inevitably happens, it will be my death.
The indomitable Margo MacDonald and Glasgow GP Dr Iain Kerr have, in different ways, focused attention on dying. More importantly, the manner of dying – whether it is fraught, perhaps messy and controlled by others or whether it is pain-free and dign
ified, exercising the last right that is left to us.

Margo's moving TV documentary My Right To Die confronted us with the fate we must all face and wrestled with assisted suicide, legalised euthanasia and the other euphemisms that surround terminal illness. The overpowering question she asked was: "How can we criminalise someone who performs the ultimate act of compassion?"

Dr Kerr appeared before the General Medical Council's disciplinary committee accused of "prescribing medication to seven patients without taking into account relevant prescribing guidance and without taking account of the best interests of the patients", in particular supplying a suicidal pensioner with sleeping tablets.

These contrasting approaches make one thing clear: death with dignity is an idea whose time has come. Sooner rather than later, a decent death will be an accepted entitlement – and Scotland has the chance to establish itself as a progressive modern nation, able to deal in a mature way with even the most sensitive issues, especially one that is bedeviled by superstition and religious bugaboos.

By one of those ridiculous constitutional quirks produced by devolution, the Scottish Parliament has power over death, but not birth. Abortion is reserved to Westminster, but Holyrood can rule on the criminalisation of euthanasia or assisted death. If they have the guts, they should use it.

Last week, the UK Government announced a new policy giving terminally-ill patients more choice over where – but not how – they die. The Scottish Government is also working on its plans for end-of-life care and has the chance to be bolder.

Margo, who suffers from degenerative Parkinson's disease, does not expect to need euthanasia but wants the reassurance of knowing there is an exit strategy if she becomes intolerably helpless: "Being utterly dependent, not being able to exercise choice and determine what happens to me, that's what I don't want." Surely, anyone with self-respect has a horror of becoming a liability or, as a son heartrendingly described his mother in Margo's film, "a shrivelled shell shrunk into the corner of the bed". I have written before, from personal experience of loved ones, that is not life; it is a living death.

There is no doubt the quest for a decent death is on the increase. The Scottish Euthanasia Society, now known as Exit, warns on its website: "Please note we are flooded with enquiries and very short on staff and resources. Please expect delays of several weeks." Yet the law states aiding or abetting a suicide in Scotland is culpable homicide, although no one has recently been prosecuted, and doctors have been struck off for helping patients to die. We all know medical staff regularly practise mercy-killing and it is over 30 years since Dr George Mair published Confessions Of A Surgeon openly admitting he had performed active euthanasia.

Margo's programme featured the Bowman family of Cumbernauld, whose father had helped their mother, a Parkinson's sufferer, to die as "an act of love" using drugs and a "suicide hood". The father died a year later but if the truth had been known, he could have faced trial for culpable homicide or murder. As Margo said: "Criminalising him for an act of mercy doesn't seem just."

Setting aside religious superstition and mealy-mouthed medical convention, it seems plain common sense to look at least to the Dignitas clinic in Switzerland which allows the terminally ill to kill themselves if they have the mental faculty and physical ability to swallow a fatal dose of drugs.

A small but significant step from that is Holland's legalised euthanasia, with the precaution that a suffering patient must be under the supervision of the doctor for at least 18 months to ensure no one is allowed to end their life for no good medical reason. Fears that the old and helpless might be pressured into accepting euthanasia have been disproved by the fact that there has been no increase in such deaths over the last eight years and the average participating GP only assists a patient to die once every 18 months.

It is a giant step to Oregon, which allows "physician-assisted suicide" with lethal drugs prescribed and kept until needed; and a step too far to Mexico where suicide tourists can buy the drug used to put down animals and try to smuggle it back home.

In this country, we are strangely incapable of coming to terms with the facts of death. Cardinal Keith O'Brien was clearly appalled to hear his friend Margo contemplate assisted suicide: "How can Margo think like that? I love and respect her so much. Life is a gift from Almighty God. If he can give it, he can take that gift from us. But we can't say: 'God, I am finished with it. I can't cope with cancer or Parkinson's'."

We hear a great deal from the "right to life" lobby but not enough about the right to choose a civilised death. I refuse to have anyone, not even a cardinal, telling me how to live my own life or die my own death. As Billy Joel concluded: "Go ahead with your own life and leave me alone."



The full article contains 945 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 19 July 2008 8:07 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: SOS News columnists
 
1

W Smith,

Middle East 20/07/2008 03:44:44
So Billy Joel is a "deep-thinking philosopher" then, eh?

Try "Billy Joel has too much money and he drank himself into oblivion and became a raging alcoholic because he's a self-indulgent a******e".

Just what we Scots need - more advice from an alkie!!

As far as assisted suicides are concerned.

I'm all for them.

Can we start with retired Scottish Labour MP's?
2

W Smith,

Middle East 20/07/2008 04:12:51
Tom Brown,

So your beloved Labour Party is all for non-interference and leaving people alone to make there own choices?

SINCE WHEN?

If Billy Joel's advice is good enough for the cardinal then its good enough for the social engineering, interfering, politically correct, busy bodies in the Scottish Labour Party.
3

donald,

glasgow 20/07/2008 09:36:58
Labour murderers have enough blood on their hands and are the last people to be consulted on humanitarian issues.
4

Hugo of Garven,

20/07/2008 10:54:58
" . . and without taking account of the best interests of the patients"

If I am the patient, who decides my best interests?

Surely it is me. I will accept a caveat that I should be of sound mind when I make the final decision.

Let me declare a vested interest in this. I am retired and, based on statistics, don't expect to live for another 20 years.

I also have a dread of a painful death. It is not death I fear; it is the manner of it.

I would like the right to a painless death.
5

Maisie from Morningside,

20/07/2008 11:50:02
Margo Macdonald has the ability now to decide whether she wants to live or die.
But when ...."Being utterly dependent, not being able to exercise choice ..." she wants somebody to kill her off!!
This is utter nonsense - If Macdonald or her supporters thinks this makes sense they've already passed the condition where they're able to exercise common sense!!!
Margo has the choice now ,and she's made it, and she's going to live.
Fair enough.
6

bill-alba,

fife 20/07/2008 15:53:02
#5 your comments are simplistic rubbish..its obvious the Margo would like to live as long and as comfortable as she can, when she can no longer live comfortably or without severe pain or disability then she wants to have help to die...
You appear to have no common sense at all..
7

Urban Guerrilla,

Edinburgh 20/07/2008 16:59:21
Totally agree. I support 'Margo's Law'.
8

Argyll on line,

Inveraray 03/08/2008 17:40:22
This latest dose of secularism coming from a lifelong Labour man is unsurprising. It is the ultimate in despair and would be a further lethal advance in the Culture of Death. Many of us believe that this life is only an infinitesimal part of eternity and that all life is in the hands of the Creator of life.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.