Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Gerald Warner: 'Yes we can,' said Salmond. 'No you won't,' replied voters



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 November 2008
'IT'S time.' Last Thursday the electorate of Glenrothes finally called time on Alex Salmond and the Heath-Robinson contraption that is the SNP blueprint for separatism. This was a smack-down on so large a scale that even the cheeky chappie himself could not fail to get the message.
SNP supporters at Glenrothes were reported as "distraught" – a delightful spectacle, there will be more of that to come. The economic recession has awakened Scottish somnambulists to the absurdity of the fantasy they were toying with: the independenc
e canard is off the agenda.

When Salmond is in the vicinity, there is never a shortage of bovine ordure. Bluster, assertion and a national economy configured on the back of a fag packet have carried him further than most. Last week, however, this posturing Pantaloon at last ran out of road.

Salmond's public career, from his "penny for Scotland" to the mythical £100bn he fantasised about deploying in an independent state to rescue HBOS, has been predicated on illusions.

His own illusions persisted into polling day last week, as witness his "Barack Obama moment" when, posing beside the Glenrothes obelisk, he borrowed the Democrat campaign slogan to declare: "Yes we can and yes we will." "Oh, no you won't!" riposted the electorate, entering into the pantomime spirit of the occasion. In the event, as one cynical commentator observed, it turned out to be more of a Neil Kinnock moment.

This buffoonery was vintage Salmond – he of the "unpardonable folly" of intervening to stop Serbian genocide, the denunciator of short-selling "spivs and speculators", which drew a sharp rebuke from his own adviser, hedge-fund manager Sir George Mathewson. Now that the balloon has been burst, the Salmond quote book makes hilarious reading. A year ago he told the Council on Foreign Relations in New York: "In fact, our nearest three neighbours – Norway, Iceland and Ireland – are respectively the first, second and fourth most prosperous countries in the world according to the UN Human Development Index."

Not in the 2009 edition, Alex. This was Salmond's "Arc of Prosperity" which, within a year, collapsed into an Arc of Poverty. Suddenly, Salmond's coaxing of Scots "Vote for independence and you can live in a second Iceland" did not seem so seductive, as the Icelandic krona lost one-fifth of its value against the dollar and plunged 30% in a day against the euro. The latest problem in bankrupt Iceland is food shortages.

Meanwhile, Celtic tiger Ireland was forced to introduce an emergency austerity budget while its government, with a GDP of ?190bn and a national debt of ?45bn, proceeded to guarantee bank liabilities of ?400bn – very much how one imagines Salmond would have behaved as leader of an independent Scotland.

Yet there was Norway. Salmond clung to that consolation, until Jonas Jahr Store, the Norwegian foreign minister, rained on what was left of his parade by contradicting the First Minister's beloved myth of Norway's £200bn "oil fund" as a misrepresentation of the facts and denied that his country had bailed out its banks.

When the SNP became the largest party at the last Scottish election, sceptical observers predicted that while voters would employ Salmond to run Holyrood in preference to discredited Labour, if it came to an independence referendum, the answer would be "No".

That was in the palmy days of credit-fuelled prosperity. Even then, opinion surveys showed a firm rejection of independence. Now, in recession, Glenrothes has given Alex Salmond his congé. The SNP might still survive in Holyrood elections – ironically, the reverse of what the party is about, since independence is a Westminster issue – if voters delegate them to mind the shop; but so far as an independence referendum is concerned – bring it on. Alex is committed to initiating a referendum in 2010: that should be a laugh. By his own admission, a "No" result would take separatism out of politics for a generation.

In the meantime, he might address the question of how he is going to pay for his multiple, gallon-sized spending commitments on a pint-sized budget. SNP activists used to tell voters impressively: "Alex Salmond is a former economist with the Royal Bank of Scotland." So were half the people that dragged us into recession.

On the BBC's Question Time programme two weeks ago, a new phenomenon was evident: on the UK stage, Salmond had become a figure of fun, a conjurer of £100bn packages for fantasy bank bail-outs. Now the laughter has spread to his native heath. Politicians can survive hatred, but not derision. It is downhill all the way from now on for Alex Salmond, Scotland's Pied Piper without a following.





The full article contains 791 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 November 2008 9:53 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: SOS News columnists
 
1

ochone,

Sauchie, Clack's 09/11/2008 01:24:14
Ok, I'll be the first to ask who exactly is Gerald Warner? there is so much wrong with this article that I am surprised that SoS printed it, I mean their is his assertions about the Norwegian Foreign Sect' for a start, did no one tell him about the follow up letter from the Norwegian Ambassador.

Wait a minute, it's a wind up, that's it he's been knocking a few back with the editor and they've decided to have a laugh at the expense of any Nat daft enough to fall for it.

Silly me.

I still don't know who he is though!
2

gus1940,

Edinburgh 09/11/2008 01:36:30
Can nothing be done to put a stop to the vile utterances emanating from this evil bigot.
3

Conan the Librarian™,

09/11/2008 02:02:16
1
ochone, the unionists are relieved at their "victory", and are putting in the boot with a vile relish.

Thank god for elderly postal voters eh? I hope they are all well and healthy.
4

Mercutio,

FALKIRK 09/11/2008 04:18:55
#s 1 2 and 3 Get a life. Gerald is a polemicist of the first order who is simply excoriating the First Minister for his hubris; it needed to be done.
5

Mr. Lachie Todd,

Edinburgh 09/11/2008 07:07:14
On the contrary, it is not down hill all the way for the Nationalists, and the constitutional question is still not fully resolved!

The author, who really should know better, is very naive in the extreme if he actually believes that one by-election setback will deter the Nationalists from pursuing their ultimate goal? Where has he been for the past 40 years?

We are not talking about defeat after a one off cup-tie but a long, gruelling league campaign!

Does he seriously believe that a well organised
political party like the Nationalists is simply going to acquiescently roll over and accept defeat?

Unlike the now irrelevant Scots Tories and annonymous Lib-Dems, the Nationalists will continue to be the major Opposition force in Scottish politics for a very long time! Scottish Devolution was an opportunity for the Nationalists just as the collapse of the UK banking system was an opportunity for a beleaguered Labour Government.

Like 'The Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come', the Nationalist movement will come back time, after time, after time, to haunt the UK State!
6

Dr. James Wilkie,

Vienna 09/11/2008 07:58:48
"'IT'S time.' Last Thursday the electorate of Glenrothes finally called time on Alex Salmond and the Heath-Robinson contraption that is the SNP blueprint for separatism. This was a smack-down on so large a scale that even the cheeky chappie himself could not fail to get the message."

Gerald, I'm afraid you haven't got the message either. In fact, you are right off the rails here. What this election showed is that the London parties are on the way out in Scotland, with the Tories and LibDems leading the way. That was the reason why Labour's share of the vote went up marginally, but the SNP's share of the carve-up of the corpses went up by four times as much. All that happened is that Labour retained the seat with a slight proportional increase in its vote (due to the Tory and LibDem fall out) and reduced actual support. That gives no encouragement to the euphoric claims that the national movement suffered a setback.

7

sm753,

09/11/2008 09:18:49

The reason for the collapse in the Lib and Tory votes, Doc, is called "anti-SNP tactical voting".

Something I think we will see rather more of.

As for the article, Gerald clearly had a few giggles writing it.

The serious point at the end is that Salmond has fallen into that lethal trap - he is now a figure of fun.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=hYq-vC5mxNQ
8

Newton_Invented_Gravity,

09/11/2008 09:28:39
Oh well, nationalism killed 'stone dead' again-apparently.
Apart from losing a by-election, the SNP hasn't done much wrong, or much different from what it was doing before, so it's hard to see where all the triumphalism is coming from.
The main factor is probably that for some utterly mystifying reason Gordon Brown has taken on the mantle of 'saviour' of the world economy. Given that the entire world economy looks set to take an even bigger nose dive in the coming months, it's a position I suspect other world leaders are happy to let him have.
9

The_Reiver,

09/11/2008 10:10:59
God, what's going on? Normally I disagree with every word that Gerald Warner writes.

Right-on Comrade!
10

The_Reiver,

09/11/2008 10:14:22
Ha Ha.. See the poor SNP posters above... still in a state of denial and delusion. I'm almost beginning to feel sorry for them. Please seek professional help- your tearing my heart strings.
11

Newton_Invented_Gravity,

09/11/2008 11:31:24
#10 Really? Denial and delusion about what?
Do tell.
12

Retiarius,

Corstorpitum 09/11/2008 12:56:07
One wee swallow - a Labour hold in its safest of safest territory - and Gerald is down at the imaginary beach, knotted hankie on head, in the midst of a glorious (fantasy) summer. All that's missing is the "If this vote were extrapolated to a General Electon it would mean a Conservative majority so huge it would mean a Tory government for 200 years". Let us leave him dreaming ... while Scotland becomes a nation, once again ...
13

Rudolf The Red,

banchory 09/11/2008 14:29:05
Warner is a thatcherite tory - what hes doing writing in the national Scottish press is a mystery that can only be solved by the editors of SOS.
14

First Minister,

Amsterdam 09/11/2008 17:57:13
#7
Tories voted New Labour last week, where will they vote in the next General Election? Knowing that if they vote New Labour again, they might win the Election?
15

sm753,

09/11/2008 18:24:03
14

Depends where you live, and what the polls look like.

In 2007 I gave my constituency vote to Labour and my regional vote to my party of choice, to stop the Nats.

In 2010 (or whenever) I may also vote Labour, depending on what the polls look like, again to stop the Nats.

Anti-SNP tactical voting is here to stay.

16

Retiarius,

Corsorpitum 09/11/2008 18:51:28
Likewise the Lanarkshire syndrome of voting for a pig (or anything else) with a red rosette, apparently ... unfortunately for the unionist rump I rather think "intelligence" is here to stay also.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.