Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Tom English: None of this McNovo stuff was his idea. It was dreamed up in a newspaper office



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 02 November 2008
NACHO NOVO for Scotland, eh? Nacho Novo who has started just two games for his club this season. Nacho Novo who got 12 minutes against Celtic, 18 minutes against Motherwell, 19 minutes versus Hibs and 32 minutes in two matches with Hamilton.
A Scotland player? Really?

Nacho Novo who was a regular starter when Walter Smith returned to Ibrox as manager, averaging a goal every 626.5 minutes in the first five months of Smith's reign.

Nacho Novo who has been used sparingly ever since, 3
3 times as a sub, 23 times as a starter.

Nacho Novo who has been shunted ever further down the pecking order by a succession of Smith signings; Daniel Cousin (now Hull), Jean-Claude Darcheville, Kyle Lafferty, Kenny Miller, Andrius Velicka.

Nacho Novo the sixth-choice striker at Ibrox when everyone's fit.

Nacho Novo the utility wide man when there's a bit of an injury crisis.

Nacho Novo who'll be 30 years old by the time Scotland play their next competitive match.

Nacho Novo who is honest and hard-working and patient and incredibly passionate about what he does but whose international football prospects in this country are held back by two not insignificant things. 1. He's not eligible. 2. He's not good enough.

Nacho must know all this. To be fair to him, none of this McNovo stuff was his idea. It was dreamed up in a newspaper office on a quiet day when the clock was ticking and the terrorising vista of a blank back page stared people in the face and was then given some kind of credence by the SFA who were too diplomatic by far to say what they really wanted to say, namely, "back away from the gin, boys, it's not a runner". They finally did that on Friday, after a fashion. The residency rule is not something they are exploiting right now, they said. It's a gentleman's agreement with the other home unions. Bloodline qualifications only. "Now at some stage in the future one or more of us (the home unions] may change our opinion and go for the full FIFA regulation – but at the moment, we're all sticking to our agreement."

In other words, if anybody half-decent comes along that can be hoiked into the national team on the residency rule then the agreement will be dumped in a heartbeat. That's not you, Nacho. Sorry.

Poor Nacho. He went along with things with a slightly bemused air but he found himself in a surreal spot, slap in the middle of warring tabloids. He was Nacho the cause célèbre to one side and Nacho the great opportunist to the other. In fact, he was neither. I suspect that Novo's true ambitions don't stretch beyond the walls of Ibrox despite his claim that it would have been an honour to represent Scotland. What else was he supposed to say? A guy asks him a question: "Hey, Nacho. What if the SFA rang you up, told you that you are their one true salvation, begged you to turn your back on your imminent prospects of usurping Fernando Torres or David Villa from the Spanish attack and declare your allegiance to Scotland. Would you be honoured?" Of course he would. But I suspect that in these downcast times, when a bit of proper game-time for Rangers is all he craves, international football is the furthest thing from his mind. I suspect that Novo has been reading all this stuff about him and his dream of playing in front of the Tartan Army and has been thinking that some Scottish newspapers really lost the plot this time.

The campaign rolled on, though. You'd have thought that those shoving the dead weight of this bandwagon would have collapsed through sheer exhaustion, but no. They were a resilient lot, heaving this old monstrosity every day, giving us updates like any of us ever believed there was any possibility of dear Nacho getting a cap. Story went that Novo would have loved to play for Scotland but he never found the time to apply for a passport. Not exactly sending out a "come and get me" message now, was he? But, hey, his girlfriend was teaching him the words of Flower of Scotland. Having lived in this country since the summer of 2001, he has mastered the first verse. What can you say? Olé!

The only reason that the SFA didn't immediately dynamite the idea of McNovo into kingdom come was not because they saw the Spaniard as a realistic prospect but because they wanted to diffuse the Novo story while at the same time keeping their options open in the future on the residency rule. This, of course, made George Burley look ambiguous on the Novo subject. Made him look like he was giving it weight. He was not.

Only in Scotland could such a long-running fuss be made about such a moderate player. No offence to the tenacious little guy but you'd want to have a dramatically low opinion of the Scottish national team to think that somebody like Novo would improve things.

A question for the denizens of Ibrox at this point, a question to those who thought that Novo would have been a good addition to Burley's set-up. Why would it have been acceptable for Novo to represent a country he was not born in but it's not acceptable for Aiden McGeady and James McCarthy to do the same? Rangers fans are deeply cynical and thunderously abusive of McGeady and McCarthy because the players have said they feel more Irish than Scottish. In Rangers' eyes, McGeady, in particular, only declared for the Republic for his own selfish reasons. Yet if Novo said he suddenly felt more Scottish than Spanish then the Ibrox faithful were seemingly prepared to accept it. In their view, Novo wouldn't have been guilty of the same opportunism they condemn McGeady for. How does that work?

Somebody is going to have to explain it to me. Better still, don't bother. The thing is over and done with now. Let it lie.



The full article contains 1037 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

GeorgeCowieOrWalterKidd?,

02/11/2008 00:49:41
I can't stomach Rangers or their fans and agree their abuse is sinister. However, I don't understand McGeady's decision. He's Scotland's best young player and he decided to play for a rival team. Scotland wanted him. It's completely different from Novo. Spain didn't want him. Plus, he's arguably much more Scottish than McGeady is Irish - he's lived in the country for a start. I'm more Irish than him as at least I have an Irish parent. Yet I could never face my mates if I opted to play for Ireland over Scotland.

If Torres decided to play for England instead of Spain, I'm pretty sure Spanish football fans would have something to say about it. Or imagine Michael Owen opting for Scotland? If Ireland's best young player, with Irish parents and a thick Irish accent, born and brought up in Dublin, decided to play for Scotland or England I'm sure fans would have something to say about that.

It's a social thing that there are people born and bred in the West of Scotland to Scottish parents who feel Irish, but that doesn't make it a good thing. People of Irish descent in Australia, Canada and the States still manage to be proud of their roots, but are first and foremost Australian, Canadian, American... Sad reflection on our society that we can't manage that - and Celtic and Rangers are probably the reason for keeping the whole thing alive and polarising people the way they do.
2

,

02/11/2008 01:16:47
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

,

02/11/2008 02:02:05
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

tsimsee,

02/11/2008 02:43:10
The bloodline concept has opened up eligibility to millions of extra people in the huge Scottish diaspora around the world. We should be focusing particularly on those the Portuguese refer to as Escocês Brasileiro. Unfortunately limiting ourselves to blood related decendents means we are limiting ourselves to Scottish people who are not the most gifted footballers. Residency makes more sense to me at least you have lived in the place and understand the culture.

5

,

02/11/2008 10:14:07
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

,

02/11/2008 10:17:47
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

Como Toes,

02/11/2008 10:30:06
Well done to Novo for wanting to play for his new homeland, integrating into society as any normal person would do - what a pity others who were born in Scotland don't do the same, the one's who would rather play for a foreign country.


8

Wee Pal Joe,

02/11/2008 10:34:19
This started in an interview with the Spanish media. Novo was asked what might well have been a throwaway question, perhaps with Spain's Brazilian Marcos Senna in mind. The Scottish media have kept it going - they need something to fill their pages and airtime.

The attempted comparison with McGeady is inane. McGeady is a young man who is the current player of the year in this country. Novo is pushing 30 and has about as much chance of getting in the Spain team as Chick Young does (with his injury). And who was actually in favour of Novo playing for Scotland anyway? Not the vast majority of Scottish fans. Not many commentators. Not the President of the SFA....
9

,

02/11/2008 10:47:16
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
10

,

02/11/2008 10:53:00
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
11

Wee Pal Joe,

02/11/2008 10:54:17
"The Argyll and Southern Highlanders" (#9)

Is that a new regiment? Connected to the Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders?

Is it?
12

,

02/11/2008 10:54:23
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
13

,

02/11/2008 10:56:23
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
14

adam murray,

Windmillhill 02/11/2008 11:06:26
Obligor -your style is very like that of Jamesy BhoyAre you the same coward?Remember remember the 4th of October No show James/Obligor
15

Feriens,

Linwood 02/11/2008 11:10:29
Molloy the coward.
16

,

02/11/2008 11:19:46
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
17

,

02/11/2008 11:21:57
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
18

,

02/11/2008 11:31:44
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
19

Daillyman,

02/11/2008 12:02:13
Idee/obligor why not give credit to the soldiers who have served they country and given up so much.

Credit to Ibrox for giving them the recognition for the soldiers and their patriotism. Its a shame that there are not more clubs in the UK doing the same thing.
20

,

02/11/2008 12:16:13
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
21

,

02/11/2008 12:19:07
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
22

If Ye Cannae,

02/11/2008 12:31:33
Vanguard man

Obligor is probably the sort of chap who would be protesting the troops return and not welcoming them back.

Is he the yellow belly James perhaps??
23

,

02/11/2008 12:39:21
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
24

,

02/11/2008 12:46:06
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
25

Daillyman,

02/11/2008 12:53:39
Idee/obligor

Reading you're posts on these forums and assuming you are a Celtic supporter do you ever post anything about them???

It is very rare, if ever, to read a post about CFC from you.
26

,

02/11/2008 12:53:51
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
27

,

02/11/2008 12:59:13
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
28

,

02/11/2008 13:02:01
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
29

If Ye Cannae,

02/11/2008 13:03:45
26

Yes we are all the same.

WE LOVE Britain and we support our troops, the question is, do you??
30

,

02/11/2008 13:03:49
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
31

,

02/11/2008 13:05:21
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
32

Britishandproud,

02/11/2008 13:06:18
I thought that Rangers led the way not only yesterday but this week in their support of the British Troops. They have helped to promote the X Factor single with all money from said single being donated to the poppy appeal as well as inviting the Troops for a Day out at Ibrox Yesterday.

I wonder if any Other Glasgow Clubs or indeed Scottish Clubs will do the same for them or are we the Only Club in this country that is also proud to be British?
33

If Ye Cannae,

02/11/2008 13:06:55
30

I do believe that, in their words "the war criminal", Dr John Reid should welcome our troops with some sort of recpetion.

Although I feel the poor lads would have to wear balaclavas so the fans would actually applaud them. ;)
34

,

02/11/2008 13:15:43
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
35

,

02/11/2008 13:23:05
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
36

,

02/11/2008 13:23:27
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
37

,

02/11/2008 13:23:46
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
38

,

02/11/2008 13:24:40
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
39

,

02/11/2008 13:26:38
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
40

,

02/11/2008 13:28:44
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
41

Britishandproud,

02/11/2008 13:33:13
#34

I am totally confused why you have came to the conclusion that expressing an opinion of the pride i felt in Rangers marking the great work of the British Troops is in any way Humiliating to Rangers!

Only in a warped mind would someone come up with that strange logic.
42

,

02/11/2008 13:36:57
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
43

If Ye Cannae,

02/11/2008 13:39:16
The refusal to answer any questions put to him (obligor) says it all for this, rancid, anti-british sadsack.

"War criminal" Dr John Reid will now have to follow suit and show support to the British troops, although it will be rather understated unlike their plastic fans dislike for anything British.
44

Daillyman,

02/11/2008 13:41:43
42

Example for you obligor, 2 lads drafted into service but run away to a neutral country.

Idee give it a rest you are staring to look like a real d!ckhead.
45

If Ye Cannae,

02/11/2008 13:45:45
42

I refuse to believe you would be sitting in a trench with any Brit beside you.

AAAHH so you ARE idee. What a joke you are!!
46

,

02/11/2008 13:46:52
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
47

If Ye Cannae,

02/11/2008 13:48:50
46

By all accounts, according to whom??

And it is now bigoted to show support for my and YOUR troops, MOPE.
48

,

02/11/2008 13:49:17
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
49

Daillyman,

02/11/2008 13:51:15
46

I think they were being applauded for being British soldiers who were part of a Scots regiment.

Speaking of bigotry!!!

But thanks for you're partiotism.
50

,

02/11/2008 13:52:26
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
51

Richardinho,

02/11/2008 13:54:25
#46 Afghanistan was supposed to turn into a kind of middle east version of Sweden as a result of the invasion, or so we were told. So far I've yet to read an account which say anything other than that it's a complete war riven mess, ruled over by corrupt war lords and with the Taliban ever threatening to return.
Exactly what was being applauded at Ibrox?
52

,

02/11/2008 13:55:40
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
53

,

02/11/2008 13:57:10
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
54

Richardinho,

02/11/2008 14:02:21
#53 'Is that the soldiers fault Afghanistan is a nightmare?'

So you're not applauding them for their actual work then?
55

,

02/11/2008 14:02:49
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
56

If Ye Cannae,

02/11/2008 14:03:11
51

So are we just meant to forget that these brave troops do a job for their country, despite the fact it was some sort of "WAR CRIMINAL" who sent them to do said job?

Where is this ghuy now I wonder and who does he work for??
57

,

02/11/2008 14:04:21
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
58

If Ye Cannae,

02/11/2008 14:05:48
57

I think him and his wee pal Idee would rather protest than support.
59

Richardinho,

02/11/2008 14:05:58
#55 You just agreed that Afghistan was a 'nightmare'. Now you're saying the troops have done a great job. Make your mind up.
60

,

02/11/2008 14:06:15
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
61

Richardinho,

02/11/2008 14:08:28
'What do you applaud at Parkhead son? Men in balaclavas who kneecap women and blow up children.'

British soldiers of course have never done this.(ahem..)
62

,

02/11/2008 14:08:52
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
63

Richardinho,

02/11/2008 14:09:47
#60 Well if Reid, who was in the British government who sent the troops to war is a 'terrorist', then so must be the British troops.
64

,

02/11/2008 14:10:37
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
65

Richardinho,

02/11/2008 14:11:37
'Are you saying British troops are at fault for this country being stuck in the 14th century?'

Well it's not the first time that the brits have invaded Afghanistan. And the Taliban were supported by the yanks against the Soviets not so long ago.
So yes, the west does have responsibility for the mess Afghanistan is in.The solution is to stop messing.
66

If Ye Cannae,

02/11/2008 14:11:42
I see he is playing the usual, DEFLECT, DENY and BLAME policy his club and fans have been playing for years.

You just cannae make them up, they are real!!

QUESTION IS, DO YOU SUPPORT OUR TROOPS??

YES OR NO??
67

,

02/11/2008 14:13:34
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
68

If Ye Cannae,

02/11/2008 14:14:43
63

Oh dear did you not read it correctly, he actually said "terrorist supporting donkey".

Are your eyes OK or do you need to take off those plastic green tinted spectacles??
69

,

02/11/2008 14:16:27
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
70

Richardinho,

02/11/2008 14:19:56
hmm British attrocities:
What about the slave trade, The Opium War with China, Attrocities in India, Concentration camps in the Boer war, The bombing of Dresden, Churchils's use of mustard gas against the arabs, the collaboration with Joe Stalin, Bloody Sunday,etc etc..

no, I don't think I shall be applauding any of these.
71

Richardinho,

02/11/2008 14:21:28
'I see he is playing the usual, DEFLECT, DENY and BLAME policy'

you'll have to explain that, What do you mean?
72

If Ye Cannae,

02/11/2008 14:23:24
71

Tell you what.

YOU ANSWER THE QUESTION YOU WERE GIVEN AND I'LL ANSWER YOURS. How hard can it be??

Deflect all you want plastic, you are showing your true colours here.
73

Richardinho,

02/11/2008 14:25:31
#72 How can I answer your questions if you refuse to clarify what they mean? Make yourself clear, and I'll be happy to answer all your questions.
74

If Ye Cannae,

02/11/2008 14:27:53
The question still remains as in post 66.

DO YOU SUPPORT OUR TROOPS??

It ain't rocket science and shouldn't take up too much of your time.

YES or NO??
75

,

02/11/2008 14:31:02
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
76

Richardinho,

02/11/2008 14:31:25
I'm not writing any blank cheques here.
I'll applaud people when they do well, and I'll condemn them when they do wrong.
I certainly do not support our troops when they commit atrocities; do you?
77

Richardinho,

02/11/2008 14:32:57
#75 shame on your family for being brit-loving vermin.
78

,

02/11/2008 14:33:34
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
79

Richardinho,

02/11/2008 14:35:38
#78 I despise traitorous scum like you. That is all.

Long live Scotland.
80

,

02/11/2008 14:35:51
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
81

If Ye Cannae,

02/11/2008 14:36:44
77

And there we have it, his TRUE colours folks.

Shame on you.

Did you go home??
82

,

02/11/2008 14:36:44
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
83

,

02/11/2008 14:37:42
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
84

Richardinho,

02/11/2008 14:38:59
Glad I've made myself clear.
85

If Ye Cannae,

02/11/2008 14:40:42
84

Very clear rhatbhoy.

Are you home yet??

Do your neighbours know what scum they live next to??
86

Richardinho,

02/11/2008 14:41:58
#85 Didn't realise they lived next door to your mother.
87

,

02/11/2008 14:42:11
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
88

Richardinho,

02/11/2008 14:43:51
'There we have it folks, a terrorist loving, Scottish hating bigot, who despises his fellow countrymen.
'
Sounds a lot like your average rangers fan.
89

If Ye Cannae,

02/11/2008 14:44:30
86

WOW that is comedy gold there.

Surely you can do better than that dhimmy??

Did you get it from the Sellick fan's book of retortes for retards??

Are you home yet??
90

,

02/11/2008 14:45:26
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
91

Richardinho,

02/11/2008 14:45:29
I have plenty of retorts for dealing with retards.
92

,

02/11/2008 14:46:15
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
93

,

02/11/2008 14:47:44
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
94

,

02/11/2008 14:48:33
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
95

If Ye Cannae,

02/11/2008 14:49:00
It wouldn't surprise me if he did support a well known Irish terrorist group at all.
96

If Ye Cannae,

02/11/2008 14:50:27
In fact I bet he puts some money in the bucket in one of those rancid, vermin filled pubs he no doubt goes to.
97

Richardinho,

02/11/2008 14:50:27
'Go on tell me, who I should be supporting?'

You should be supporting Scotland, not england. Simple as that.
98

,

02/11/2008 14:55:32
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
99

If Ye Cannae,

02/11/2008 14:56:27
97

EH??

His father is English his mother is Scottish and he should be supporting Scotland??

Maybe you should forward your post to Aiden McGeady eh??
100

,

02/11/2008 14:56:44
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
101

Richardinho,

02/11/2008 14:57:04
I support Scottish soliders, i condemn Scottish traitors.
102

,

02/11/2008 14:57:55
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
103

If Ye Cannae,

02/11/2008 14:58:29
101

Another riddle or do you care to explain??

Are you saying Scottish soldiers who fight for Queen and Country are traitors??
104

Richardinho,

02/11/2008 14:59:18
#102 You are the dullard if you think that Scotland is in an equal union with england. On all counts, it is clear that it is very unequal indeed.
105

Richardinho,

02/11/2008 15:00:15
#103 that depends which queen and which country really, doesn't it?
106

,

02/11/2008 15:00:23
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
107

,

02/11/2008 15:01:19
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
108

,

02/11/2008 15:02:43
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
109

Richardinho,

02/11/2008 15:02:53
There's a clear distinction between being Scottish and being British. Yet you choose to ignore it at every turn.
110

If Ye Cannae,

02/11/2008 15:03:38
105

Your avoiding the question again.

There is only ONE Queen who Scottish troops fight for, and that is Queen Elizabeth II. Do you support those troops or are they as you say "traitors".
111

,

02/11/2008 15:06:53
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
112

Richardinho,

02/11/2008 15:09:07
I don't agree that these troops fight for 'the queen'. I believe they join the army cause it's the best job available to them, and that they have much more loyalty to their immediate comrades than to abstract notions of 'queen and country'.
113

,

02/11/2008 15:10:47
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
114

,

02/11/2008 15:11:15
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
115

If Ye Cannae,

02/11/2008 15:12:03
He appears to be an enigma, a conundrum, a puzzle.

Wants to be a patriotic Scot but calls our brave troops "traitors".

Would he prefer them to wear balaclavas, and then maybe they would gain his support, although I very much doubt it would be wanted because we can all see what sort of person he is.
116

,

02/11/2008 15:13:11
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
117

Richardinho,

02/11/2008 15:14:15
#113 British cause of your NI number. Says it all really.
118

,

02/11/2008 15:14:31
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
119

,

02/11/2008 15:15:55
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
120

Richardinho,

02/11/2008 15:16:29
#119 I don't like traitors.
121

,

02/11/2008 15:16:29
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
122

If Ye Cannae,

02/11/2008 15:16:43
116

As you say, wee Aiden must be the most patriotic Scotsman known to man, oh no wait he's Irish apparently.
123

,

02/11/2008 15:17:56
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
124

Richardinho,

02/11/2008 15:18:27
I would have thought it patently obvious that Scottish troops should not have been/be in Ulster.
125

,

02/11/2008 15:18:47
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
126

If Ye Cannae,

02/11/2008 15:18:58
120

Answer the question(s).

Are Scottish troops "traitors"?

Should Aiden McGeady be playing for Scotland??
127

If Ye Cannae,

02/11/2008 15:19:37
124

How to avoid questions with vague answers.
128

,

02/11/2008 15:19:38
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
129

,

02/11/2008 15:20:19
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
130

,

02/11/2008 15:20:57
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
131

If Ye Cannae,

02/11/2008 15:21:14
124

Richardinho

That's the DEFLECT part.
132

Richardinho,

02/11/2008 15:21:41
'Regardless of the rights and wrongs, did you support them?'

You think one should disregard rights and wrongs when making a judgment?
133

Richardinho,

02/11/2008 15:22:18
#131 'That's the DEFLECT part.'

What do you mean?
134

,

02/11/2008 15:23:29
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
135

,

02/11/2008 15:24:21
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
136

If Ye Cannae,

02/11/2008 15:24:27
133

You are deflecting any questions with very vague answers.

It is not like these guys had a choice, they are told where to go and should be supported, although it would appear, not by yourself.

DID YOU SUPPORT THEM WHEN THEY WERE IN ULSTER?
137

,

02/11/2008 15:24:53
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
138

Richardinho,

02/11/2008 15:27:14
'You are deflecting any questions with very vague answers.'

No, it is your questions that are vague.


'It is not like these guys had a choice, they are told where to go and should be supported, although it would appear, not by yourself.'

So lets just be clear: soldiers who commit atrocities should be supported-that's what you think?
139

,

02/11/2008 15:27:34
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
140

,

02/11/2008 15:28:55
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
141

Richardinho,

02/11/2008 15:30:36
#140 I gave you a list of Brit atrocities down through they years above. Do you support british soldiers who commit atrocities?
142

,

02/11/2008 15:30:43
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
143

Richardinho,

02/11/2008 15:32:16
#142 The British airforce pilots who sprayed mustard gas on Iraqis. Should they have got a standing ovation at Ibrox?